ZAPstract - art that zaps!

All posts by Rey Armenteros

The Self-Interview of Rey Armenteros (first published in Modern Literature)

23 April 2024 by Rey Armenteros

Where do you usually write? At a computer? Longhand on a yellow pad? Typewriter?

Ideally, I write prose on a keyboard, because I need the speed of writing to come close to the speed of thought. If something occurs to me out in public somewhere, I might scrawl phrases and ideas that I will later flesh out on the keyboard. In contrast, when I am writing poetry, I write on a notepad (or something small), and I am standing up and walking or pacing the house. I want to be physically active. I am taking steps, and my thoughts are striding along. The speed of the words as they are recorded needs to be slower in poetry, so that I can deliberate a little more, hold them in front of me before letting them go.

How much research do you do?

I used to answer this by offering the list of every book I ever read. I learned something from them, even the bad ones, and the way my thoughts and writing style formed was in large thanks to them. So, I never research anything. If I don’t know it, I don’t write about it. But that’s not exactly true. There are times when I’m curious about something, and I look it up with the possible intention of writing about some aspect of it. But I generally write like I draw pictures; I just do it off the top of my head.

Is there a relationship between your art and your writing?

There is in that they are made from the same source, and the concerns I have in one run parallel with the other. There is also the idea that writing and drawing come from the same prehistoric backyard. They may have been linked, as is evidenced in pictograms. I sometimes feel this link when I’m covering my world with inky marks as easily as I cover it with words. But I go into each one with different ideas in mind.

I’ll give you three examples — two writing and one drawing. In my memoir, I naturally turn to the past to get something from that time. By contrast, when I write poetry, I make up a lot of it, almost as if writing snippets of responses to some of my favorite books, as if reacting off night dreams. Better yet, I am really trying for the poem to come to life without having a strong reception to a past. Poems are about right now, with tenebrous links to past and future. When I paint, I try to bring up the images I have in mind. There might be a narrative sequence to these images, and they might even insinuate words, but they are wordlessly quiet, even if word balloons show up with mysterious symbols in them.

How many half-finished works do you have?

Like most anybody, too many. If you go back to every idea I put to pen, it would be impossible to count. I do have a battalion of books filed away in various stages of completion that are still in the running for becoming finished. They are a collection I keep that somehow describes my possible future career as it might look with that many accomplishments. I don’t know the number off the top of my head, but it is slowly growing. I do know that together, they comprise over two million words.

Does writing energize you?

It could if I’m excited about what I’m writing. Sometimes, I don’t feel like writing, mostly because I have nothing in mind at the moment, but I force myself to continue the practice. And this could energize me if I find a pot of gold in this dense forest. But often I feel bored or dejected when nothing comes out of these sporadic adventures.

When I do have something to say, it is quite different. It could also go one way or the other. I either take the idea I have in mind and use words to choke the life out of the voice, and thus kill the piece, or the two come together nicely. I get excited when the latter circumstance is happening.

Do you make demands on the reader?

I used to. I feel they were unrealistic demands. I used to feel that if a reader did not understand the connections I was trying to make, then I had done what I could. This was frustrating for anyone, because these connections I believed in were more obscure than most readers would allow time for. So, I stepped back, and I moved to a more communicative approach and dropped a lot of these wonderful ideas along the way. They might have been wonderful, but I didn’t have the ability to bring them into this world.

I now write with more responsibility as a writer. I don’t merely tack on the duty to a capable reader (although I still make demands on the reader, I think). The idea is that you have to supply the words with different layers of understanding. The texture is there at the most superficial level, and that is the one thing everyone will recognize, consciously or half-consciously. And then there is the shape the texture dresses and is influenced by, and this could be the events or the sequence or the actual representation of things. And then the forces at work that animate the shapes, if you go in deep enough, and then finally the patterns the forces create, if you are stepping so far back as a reader, that you can almost sense it all. Regardless if a reader can or cannot, it is all there. And all of these things have a place in the experience of the reader, whether the reader actively responds to it or not.

Have you ever gotten reader’s block?

I’m not sure I even know what that is. But I do go through periods of not reading anything but comic books. During such instances, my writing suffers for it. I have a long list of things to read, but each book needs to arrive at the right time. If I feel I’m not ready for a certain poetry book or a rereading of Moby Dick, I put it off until my current state-of-mind is in line with it, or the right season has arrived. Sometimes, because of these dynamics I place on my reading, I don’t have something ready, so I find I’m reading comics or art history books. I’d like to read poetry everyday — at least, that’s been the plan. I don’t own enough poetry books to fill my reading year, and the libraries no longer carry much of such stuff anymore. So, I need to buy more poetry.

What’s your favorite unappreciated book?

I would have said Moby Dick or Nostromo, but that might not be right for this question. If I argue that nobody reads Moby Dick and hence it is unappreciated, then I would be answering the question. But Moby Dick is still celebrated, so I should find a better answer. There are so many books that fall under this heading.

We were talking about the responsibility of the writer, and as a reader, you have a responsibility too. I don’t know if most people realize this. You have the responsibility to try to turn the book around and find it through the author’s time and place. Who was this person when the words were put to paper and what was really being said? When you pick up a book, there are certain things the book is telling you about it before you even start to read. The title, the cover, its dedication. They could be sending you the wrong message, but you try to figure it out early on, maybe to see if it is your cup of tea or to try to understand where the author is coming from. If you read it and pick up on something other than what is in the words and implications, it is hard to ignore, and the reader should make an attempt to understand this. For example, when reading a 19th Century novel, where the language is more formal, it is easy to dismiss it as hoity-toity and forget that its stiff style might actually be the weave it needed for the story. I don’t know if my idea is coming across. It’s complicated, but I do feel the reader has a responsibility to get at what the writer is trying to accomplish — to try to step into the writer’s shoes — even if they don’t care for the work before them.

Do you view writing as a spiritual practice?

I don’t know. There was a time I did, and I’m sure there is some idea of that now lingering still in the back of my head. Yes, all types of art-making has to have a spiritual component for it to even be an art form. But if you hold that concept up to the light, as if admiring a piece of well-made machinery at the same moment as when you are trying to make it work, that thing that makes it run so well has just ceased operations. If writing becomes a means of getting the spiritual out, it won’t. I recall a long time ago writing some piece of inspired narration, and I was addressing the soulful outlook I was having with the richest words I could pluck from my growing well of eloquent words. It was the closest, as far as I can remember, of having felt that inner spirit at the same time as I was working. And the real problem came later when I tried reading this thing, and it felt like scrubbing sandpaper on your tongue. I felt so embarrassed. Because you declare something, it does not make it so. Lesson learned.

Have you ever read anything that made you feel different about fiction?

Yes, I’m sure I did, though nothing comes to mind. I could say the same things about other genres of literature, not just fiction. The Lives of theTwelve Caesars by Suetonius is one of those books that is not fiction, but it made me feel a bond with the humor of the time. I was mesmerized by the idea that something that was two thousand years old could make me laugh like that! The humor in it seemed to transcend time. Then again, the credit could be given to the translator, Robert Graves, whose broad talents might have nudged the English version to be funnier than the Latin. I’ve always meant to read a different translation of that book to see if it brought out the same comedic effervescence that Graves’s version offered.

What authors did you dislike at first?

The ones I dislike, I usually don’t change my opinion on, even after reading other works by the same author, sometimes multiple times — and I read them several times because I’m such a glutton for punishment, honestly. I remember not understanding what made Charles Dickens so great. A Tale of Two Cities is one of the worst pieces of classic literature I had ever read, because of the convenient coincidences, the cardboard characters, the tidy lesson at the end — all staples of Dickens story-craft, as I learned from some of his other books. Then I read excerpts of this book years later, and I noted how well he turned a sentence, how the pacing between the words and imagery were trains of thoughts and diction that shared the rails at the same time. And I respected him thereafter as a capable stylist, even if the actual stories, though iconic, were not all that exhilarating.

Leave a comment | Categories: Writing Process | Tags: ,

Artwalk, Corkscrew, Armchair (first published in The Nasiona)

17 March 2024 by Rey Armenteros

Went to Vincent’s art opening with Alaric. Drove sixty miles out there. Had conversations in the car. Had a quick dinner. Walked around. Small town in the mountains: Riverside. Like going halfway out into the dessert. Town center was no bigger than a grid of blocks, Spanish style architecture, lots of things like people and trees practically floating in arid wasteland.

We met Vince. Hugs. Immediate assistance. Dude. Vince was nervous. His reception after all. And he was quietly losing it. We were talking him into calming down. It was held at a gallery/frame shop sort of place owned by a man Vince knew named Didier. Vince’s art filled the large wall at the front of the store beautifully. It was several square panels depicting misty abstractions under a bartop finish.

Handling the refreshments was now my job. Corkscrew in hand, I tried to say something to Vince. I tried but I have no sense of humor anymore. On the very first bottle. Broke the only corkscrew! Didier’s look was hard to read. I put the corkscrew down. Playing it off, I wanted to make a joke, almost told the Historic Fart story from the Arabian Nights. But better I left that one alone. Didier said, “Man!” There was nothing else to do. Alaric and I stepped out to check out the Art Walk. Wine bottles remained unopened. We told Vince to keep calm, hold the fort. Didier called out, “See you later, Corkscrew!”

What made up the Art Walk was art spaces, frame shops, one or two museums, art co-ops, a tattoo parlor. First place sold clothing and art. A lot of art on the walls. Wasn’t sure, but it all seemed to suck. What did Alaric think? I was sure we were on the same page. We were art school progeny, after all. Not likely to like anything. Exiting, we came up with code terms on how to get the hell out of a place when it was bad like that. He chose “pastel” and I preferred “Neo-Impressionism.” It didn’t matter because everything was bad. Never used either term. Expected levels of bad, except Vince’s work, or course. And two shows at the Photography Museum.

One African-American artist. Came from the post-hippie era — you know, psychedelic colors, that kind of art. Definitely well-made. A good sense of craft and so on and so forth. It could have been good to anybody but former art majors. The only thing that prevented me from blurting “Neo-Impressionism” was a little respect for survivors of historic conflagrations. And exiting that other place that looked more like a beauty salon than an art space, where they showed works from the criminally insane, I was asking Alaric. Just what about us made us such assholes? Why didn’t we like anything? He said we were jaded.

And this could explain a lot. In the main art museum, I was trying to take it in. The likable small town community air. But then more bad art on the walls. Walls that would have been better served with nothing, and I asked him if it would ever get to the point where we become so jaded that we don’t care for any art. Except our own. He didn’t believe it would ever happen, at least not in our lifetimes, and then he retracted, and he said it wouldn’t happen for a long time, at least, anyway.

Two girls doing the museum rounds like us, repeatedly running into us, a mirror of us but lacking that cynical veneer that took time and very particular art experiences at critique seminars to properly nurture. There was an open plaza, and they were across it from us, in symmetry with us, a mockery of the enthusiasm we once had.

The guy at the hybrid fast-food joint earlier. He was there. Approached the girls. Then, approached us, handing us something. “Check out this panel that will discuss optics and how we look at art. Coming up.” Fascinating, but not for us.

Yeah, we were jaded. That was about all the art we could stand.

Hot streets, trees, old style charm, people in small breezy clothes. If anything, it was a good time because of this. Being out here made it all worth it. And we were chatting it up. I couldn’t shut up. When you live strictly in your head space, when you never get out much anymore. Well, you accumulate stuff in your head. No dialogue for me these days. Lost all contact with every artist I ever knew except these two guys today and maybe two others. Alaric would understand me. And Vince too.

Headed for conversations about being a parent, which Alaric was and I was becoming. And my book, which he inquired about, and of which I had just finished the second draft. It was about that thing I was pursuing, the way we draw when we’re drawing from our imaginations, and what actually happens in mid-drawing. If anything, a book like that was at least going to get me understood. You can bet, he said that he would like to read that one. We were talking about Charles, our mutual friend, who gave up looking for the big art career in Los Angeles, and how he was moving back to San Luis.

Indeed. A move like that. Such an action was a statement. It spoke about how you were no longer going to play the game.

We were back. The wine bottles were open. A brand new corkscrew nearby. Vince was talking to art walk goers, maybe pitching a sale. We were winking at him, happy to be back in a room full of powerful air conditioning.

Alaric was commenting about how badly he wanted to sit in those two armchairs. Never having thought about it, I wasn’t sure where he was going with this. Ten minutes later, the women in the chairs vacated, and we sat down. Alaric learned they were the kind you can kick back. Questioning the inappropriateness — to lounge like this at a friend’s art opening. Well, we kicked them back anyway. And I can say right here, I have never thought about couches or armchairs that way. There are people who only buy quality. I say, if it’s cheap, that’s good enough. But now I see what is so important about a good chair. A new understanding about furniture, about how your body naturally falls into appropriate spaces.

A man came up, asked me did I know that many a naked woman used the very chair I was sitting on. (Absolutely recognized where this was going. I knew what was coming next because I taught the same classes.) He said that he and Didier were teaching a live figure drawing class and the two chairs we were using were props. He gestured the bodily graces of these women, and he told us it was great. And then said I didn’t look too bad either, even with my clothes on, and walked away.

Then that woman showed up again from earlier, telling Vince she had to go and that it was great meeting us but not meeting us, and then “took the opportunity” to formally meet us and gave us her name. Her lively talk, how she kept going on about the art. Lurking. I don’t know. Was there a stock act you had to go through at an art function?

I was starting to sulk. Alaric wanted to use the bathroom without losing his spot in the chair. A universal problem, discovered almost the minute you start school. My timing was always off, and I always lost my spot. Went to check out this red-lit bathroom Alaric talked about anyway when I finally had to go and still managed to get my seat back.

Time to leave. Congratulated Vince for the swell show, and for selling seventeen pieces for eight thousand dollars just last week at another art thing. Couldn’t have happened to a nicer guy. I don’t know about Alaric, but it gave me hope. Passing the entrance, Didier called out, “Corkscrew!”

How do you go about selling eight thousand dollars worth of art? Just earlier, before Riverside and the art walk, before the long ride. We were in Alaric’s basement. It was his art studio. He was showing me his latest work. They were prints of nuclear explosions superimposed with flowers. Everything was presented in the cyan-magenta-yellow screen patterns of past printing. It looked good. Good enough to sell. I was like, game plan. “Do you have one?” It was complicated. For both of us. Like him, I had a bedroom standing in for a studio. I didn’t have a game plan, not really. Not a real one. And he was telling me he didn’t have a game plan either.

I was thinking about this and that. There were too many variables, like the world’s problems but in more microcosmic proportions. Politics. The politics of making it in your field. He said he had nothing. “I’ve got nothing.” As far as a game plan. Nothing. He said he had enough with trying to keep a two and a half-year-old alive and doing his work. I was looking for a bona fide strategy to how to get from A to B and then C, along with alternate paths, if necessary. The book I was writing was a large part of that; that was the A that was going to get me to B, which would have been getting my art understood at least, if not recognized. C was making lots of money. I wasn’t sure how to get to that last one. He shrugged. He had nothing.

Back in the car. Several hours later. Night time. Riverside. Set for the long drive back. Alaric made a note about how you never see bicycle cops anymore. There were three of them cycling around the open square where people were dancing to music from a large speaker. Only lit with streetlight. Like a nightclub that had been folded inside out and had lost its electricity in the process. Two or three people moved out of the way suddenly. One jumped back. Reaction stamped on all faces looking in one direction.

And Alaric asked me if I saw the cops diving, tackling the guy. I was cruising slowly but couldn’t see anything in that half-light with all the figures motionless, facing East.

On our drive back, I wanted to talk more. Why did Francis Bacon destroy his paintings? Had Alaric read any books recently? What was the ideal city to live in? Certainly not Los Angeles.

“You don’t like it here?” he asked.

Huh. I never dropped that sentiment to native Californians. Didn’t really know how to answer. “You know how after a few years, you get sick of a place? Los Angeles is the type of place where you come here already sick of it, but it slowly grows on you.”

How’s that for optimism? How’s that for diplomacy? Politics?

Brought up abstract games, how they looked like little sculptures but they also moved according to game rules, which made them more interesting in the sense of possibilities. Almost like moving philosophies, better equipped to display ontology than an endless line of words in a book on metaphysics.

Alaric was moving his head, turning to me. “Abstract games?”

“They’re games,” I explained, “board games that don’t have an obvious theme, games like Chess and Go.”

But abstract games look like abstract sculptures, I was reasoning. Except they move according to the rules of the game. And this time element is fascinating. Definitely an element of art if you looked hard enough. And I’ve been thinking a lot about this. Something to look into. Abstract games.

And the conversation stopped there. Got out of my car in front of his house. I had so much more I wanted to talk about. Perhaps a conversation during a future drive.

Was pulling one of the pamphlets out of my pocket. Alaric didn’t say anything. But I know he’s noticed that every time we go to gallery shows, I collect all the free paraphernalia at the art spaces, brochures and the like. (I’ve kept them all.) Here was the Riverside Art Walk brochure. I snorted. I showed him the picture on the back flap asking him if the guy in the picture didn’t look familiar. It was a man drawing a woman (a clothed woman) on an armchair. The armchair was one of the two we were sitting on. “This,” Alaric said, “is the very best way to end the night.”

On my drive back home, I was recapturing my thoughts on ambition, thinking about the words I wasn’t able to use but wanted to. The ideas behind things, and the way people use these things created by ideas to make things happen.

I was now on the freeway. Thinking now about game mechanics. Abstract games when done right. A most appropriate device to exhibit the dynamics of life.

I like that. Nodding to some jazz on the local station. I like that a lot.

 

— Rey Armenteros

Leave a comment | Categories: Essay | Tags: ,

Wandering into Yesterday’s Tomorrow (first published in Still Point Arts Quarterly)

08 February 2024 by Rey Armenteros

Clicking around the internet, I found someone I used to know. Through her webpage interactions, I found photo after photo of her and then other familiar faces. A face awash in flash photography was smiling at me, and I could not remember this other girl’s name. She was sending a message to an old co-worker of mine, who used to be really crazy about her, telling him that she was an aesthetician, and that she’s been doing it for about eleven years now. He responded by saying that maybe they could meet again (though they were now thousands of miles apart) and that they could make new memories, and I knew exactly what he had in mind.

I was right there with him once upon a time, when I was infatuated with some of these ladies, before they became aestheticians and other things, before returning to their homelands… before eleven years!

The first girl was looking back at me in another picture with the same face from back in the day. It was unbelievable. Mari looked even better than when in her mid-twenties; her hair was done up like a marble sculpture and her earrings dropped down to mirror the glitter in her eyes, and the makeup was just right for the shape of her face and her small eyes. I was still blinking at the image when I recalled the fact that she had had a thing for me for a short while, but it was something I never jumped on. I simply wasn’t into her, and today, I find myself wondering why. But memory, in its hindsight and conclusions, distorts reality when you question past facts, when you wonder why it was we never got it on in the first place, raising a fervor of hopes never realized, never registered — because they never existed.

Going through more pictures and clicking to more pages hosted by others, I found more faces that tickled old hopes in my memory banks. They’d all grown older.

This period in my life didn’t even comprise two years; I was gone by the time everyone here was returning to their countries. But in those days, I was teaching ESL to these young adults from around the world. They were in San Francisco to learn English and have a good time. After school, we would continue the English practice at a bar or outdoor cafe. There were drinks, much curiosity about how things were done in Japan or Brazil or France. But beyond these friendly interactions, we were not to get involved with any of these people, and yet some of us did.

These days I don’t give much thought to those days, but they meant something to me back then. Now I can see in their faces the hopes I had, of friends and lovers. Any woman I met at the school went through a quick sizing up, and when I decided that I liked one, I could never get her out of my thoughts, unless I was thinking about any of the other ones. That was my life back then: girls, women — I was always on the lookout. Instead of forwarding my art career by trying to get it to the next stage, I was engrossed in searching for that kind of action; I was devoting long tracks of conscious thought to it. My mind was bent in only one direction.

So, I was far from perfect, but though I don’t have such chains today, I am no closer to perfection; I am now missing something. All these other things happened. I got married, and I got serious about my art, and I have carried on in a responsible way, and I never once thought about all I had lost in the process. Right along with those twisted hopes of romancing women, that joyous spirit has also abandoned me. Though it was not quite half-real, that love of life brought a spontaneity and a yearning for human interaction that was completely real — that today I shun.

Look at all these people I used to know, and never that well — because outside your loved ones, who do you know, really? But I did know them somehow, and they knew me, somewhat — even if the me they knew was not transparent, not out in the open about those inner demons that had been tickling his eye when it caught a smile, a tone in a phrase directed at him, a female form walking away.

And what could such things mean in a continuum of time that has never stopped, never divided itself into neat stacks of chapters in a life? It was not until you started looking back that the flow was gone because it was now chopped to bits that were easier to comprehend, to peg into the meaning you want to give each particular era of your life. And what is almost always lost to memory are the old hopes that can no longer be realized. If my hopes used to be shallow, they still came with a curiosity for people, and today I have shrugged off all interest in the casual stranger.

Everyone grew older, which is that thing we see coming but it always takes us by surprise. It’s a thing that we get ready for but then gasp when we witness it in the flesh, in the creeping truth of creased surfaces and hobbled thoughts and adjusted gestures.

These pictures of this young woman who is now older but better looking than when she was in her prime present fanciful hopes; for though I did reject Mari, I nevertheless enjoyed the attention. I was secretly going out with one of her closest friends, which forced her to cease talking to us when she found out, until I dumped her friend and started going out with another one of our students. And then we were friends again.

They were all adults and they knew what they were doing, as I would tell myself. It was true, but it was also true that I was a conniving bastard. There were other instructors at the school who were doing the same thing, but I was a fraud because I pretended to be uninterested in all that — secretive to the degree that I thought no one knew a thing about my questionable propensities.

But students know, and the dynamics of a classroom, as they instructed us at the TEFL crash course I took, is ruined once a teacher begins going out with one of the students. I tempted job termination as it was outlined in our employee handbook. And by risking this kind of occupational doom, I was warming to the fact that I was getting away with murder. There was only one instructor that outdid me, and Mikael was out in the open about everything, and he carried on with his wickedness with a flair for style, a conscious quest for the lust for life. And he never got fired. He did go out with one student after another, but he also enjoyed people; he would play guitar at these get-togethers, pulling at arms for a dance, leading a whole group of guys and girls, stepping outside to talk to the smokers who could not do their thing inside the bars, and then fall into step in a gutter with genuine words to a homeless man as they danced the talk dynamic.

If I could do it again, I would hop into Mikael’s beat to match his positive energy, because he had style and I did not — my looks were reserved, my words careful. I used to tell people I was undercover, and this joke was the one detail I ever revealed about myself. I enjoyed believing that I had a mask that smothered my real expressions. It made me feel cool because there was nothing cooler than a blank expression. Maybe. But who truly befriends the silent plotter sitting in the back of the room, scoping it all, coming up with the correct tactics for interactions?

Who knows? But it didn’t matter in the long run because even if my smiles were sometimes forced, I was no less happy.

I was living it up. If I didn’t have as many girls at my arm as I would have liked, I was certainly not one to complain. My entire life was stretched out before me, and I was stumbling through it with romantic deviations which were interrupting my lifelong ambitions as an artist. Indeed, I was an artist twenty-four hours a day, but these plans I had for drawings and artistic concepts always took a backseat to the social allure that surrounded me.

My future in art, as it was perceived in those scatterbrain days, was going to be glorious. In those days, it was entering my head that, as far as the art world was concerned, the products of most creative endeavors were unfortunately akin to the jetsam that drains out into the ocean, enjoying its short time at a gallery before the city finally buries it and its creator. My art was not going to travel down those waterways.

I remember this conviction. It was the belief that there must be other artistic paths to take, and that success came in different forms. I feel obliged to describe my work from those days in order to support such a conviction. I would here offer examples in the studio of yesterday, but I can’t think of any right now. I can’t retrace the formations of the great discoveries I had while drawing with brush and ink deep into the night. The origins of old ideas are all but gone. Nevertheless, the main concept behind everything was that this work touched on the connection between drawing and writing. In my impromptu drawings, black lines represented both pictorial aspects and words as if I were trying to reconcile both branches of symbolic mark-making. It was easy to reconcile them because the same lines that formed the letters of the alphabet were made to represent the textures of trees and the motifs of bricks and the contours of figures. Words populated my pictorial world in the sky of a landscape and in the dress of a dancer. That meant words were tickling my pictures with their own chronology and beat. Syntax and sound became pivotal to my drawings, and the construction of fragments and their more polite brethren, sentences, was fascinating to me.

For the longest time, I never knew a drop of grammar, but that TEFL crash course I took started me on a long mission, and I was learning verbal tenses and their aspects, and this, above human anatomy and artistic shading, is what now fascinated me. There was so much to learn. It would take me the rest of my time teaching ESL in San Francisco to get a holistic view of it. There was so much, I was overwhelmed by it. Nevertheless, that San Francisco era of my teaching career can be best symbolized by one grammar point whose name I found hilarious. Future in the Past was a verbal tense that enthralled me; I would return to it again and again in my classes and in my own ruminations. In use, it was the tense that drew out past intentions whose results may or may not have come to pass. May or may not have happened. Sometimes, the statement was vague. An appropriate example is: “We were going to go to the bar.” It is a plan that was made in the past, and unless something is clarified, there is no evidence that it was successful or not.

Why, I wondered, were such expressions reluctant to reveal outcomes? I wanted concrete results from my words and would choose language in my drawings that could only level its utensils to literal meaning without any of that linguistic ambiguity people kept going on about back in art school days.

But even though I was fighting it, I already understood that tangible, unequivocal results were almost impossible with words. So, I explored the force behind words in my art and outside of it. Words were always tricky, and I might have latched onto grammar because it was a system of rules that invited no deviations. Once the apparatus of grammar embedded itself in my head, I wanted to comprehend the entire system that made English English.

It was purely mechanical. To learn this system in order to be able to teach it to students, I needed monkey wrench and pliers. And in order to teach, I had to think of analogies. But I was a new instructor, so I couldn’t come up with any. In Future in the Past, these actions either come to pass or they don’t. What more is there to it? Future in the Past also has the sound of some kooky science fiction time traveling story. I would laugh about such analogies at the head of the class, complicating the grammar lesson with fond anecdotes of anachronous moments in old B-movies and comic books, granting my students a slice of American humor and receiving nothing but blank expressions. I savored the thought that there were an infinity of future plans that were locked in the past. Since these things never came to be, it is interesting to see such things as events that could have gradually brought about a different world.

Among the verbal tenses, this is the patron saint of the unborn pieces and positions of our existence. Certain moves become events that seem to be inevitable, while others can never be brought to fruition, no matter how strong the passions that drove them.

In my world, the future in my past included ambitions of such high expectations that making it into galleries was simply not good enough. My art was destined for greater things, transcending art and philosophy. This art was in the act of becoming something new, something never seen before by the art market and its art-consuming populace. My work was allowing me to discover the dynamics by which we arrive at images in our brains. I was systematizing this according to my own experiences with drawing from the imagination. I was calling this work Techne-Sophy, a neologism of mine from the fragments of Ancient Greece that comprised one part craft with one part wisdom. For that time I was filtering all my work through carnal desires and foreign substances, I was coming up with theoretical solutions that had nothing to do with my perpetual diversions. In these loftier pursuits, I was coming up with incredible conclusions. And I was putting these conclusions together in entirely original ways: hundreds and hundreds of pages of brush-drawn words and images to make books.

I thought I had all the time in the world. I had it all figured out. But forwarding an art career is like moving a mountain, and it needs all the help it can get. It needs a head start, and going at it without one could be the crucial factor to stalling a career — perhaps forever. The head start I needed was that of nurturing its public presence, which takes years. I was getting none of that done, convinced that by just making the work, the venue would arrive at my door. I really had no idea what was in store for me, what my art career was not going to look like for years to come because I was plotting my real moves at the bar. I was too busy tripping and grooving to the here and now and not too concerned with later. I was moving to the music of social interactions in loud, dark rooms with people I knew at the school, laughing it up with my fellow instructors, winking and giving high fives. We were all learning languages with a couple words here and there and mixing in this soup of translations and sexual attraction.

And then there were these students we were drinking and dancing with, and who knows what they were thinking? I wanted most of them to at least respect me. I recall this one older woman who had a family and was a dentist in her country, and we had mutual respect for each other. She was always the smart one in the class, and her English was quite accomplished. This was the type of student I taught for, the type that appreciated whatever lesson I was giving them. Though never interested in her in that other way, I sought her reticent approval and was confident that I had a good portion of that.

In that same class (to contrast), there was a girl that had just started at the school. She was fresh and new, like a spring flower, yes, and I think I strived for her approval too. I don’t know why I was attracted to her; she was not my type. I guess you could say she was so wholesome, and that raised curiosity in me.

Well, I never thought we would ever consummate anything since I wasn’t going to go after her. I never would have come up with where it was soon going to go.

As it stood, Mari’s friend was my girlfriend we could say, when we were still an item (though hardly anybody knew about us). But this somewhat girlfriend of mine, Mari’s friend, knew I was in the process of going out with two other people from outside the school. She had a boyfriend back in Japan, so we were both deceptive, but I guess she estimated that I was the bigger traitor because of the additional lover. When she left her boyfriend for me, she wanted me to at least give up one of my other girlfriends. I told her I would in good time, but I was vague about the details.

Even then, our relationship was not out in the open. She would secretly visit my apartment because we couldn’t be seen outside since the dorm where most of the students stayed was only four urban blocks from my place. Since we couldn’t even go to a neighborhood restaurant, she spent nothing more than the nights with me, which worked wonders on my pocketbook since I didn’t have to spend a cent. I felt a profound satisfaction by the direction our relationship was taking — at her being the prettiest girl at the school and at my having to do no work for it.

In the middle of the early morning hours, she would walk back to the dorm from my apartment. I never accompanied her for the sound reason that we could get caught even at three in the morning by a student coming back from a night club or whatever. So I let her go by herself in that questionable stretch of Sutter Street, never entertaining the thought that something could have happened to her.

One time, a fellow student was on a payphone at a 24-hour place catching this girl’s return from my apartment. The students knew I lived close by. This student at the payphone put two and two together but stayed quiet about it. For months, I thought I was completely covered, and eventually, in a casual conversation with my dentist student, she informed me she had always known, that she had seen the girl coming back from my apartment late one night and that was that. And she wasn’t the only one that knew. My dentist student was smiling about it, displaying the kind of shrug that meant, “such is life.” And because of her levity, I did not feel too bad about it, but it haunted me weeks later, when I finally realized that she was just being diplomatic, and that she probably didn’t smile at such acts. And that was when I concluded that my dentist student didn’t see me any differently than she did the teachers that were flagrant about their habits.

And that was when everything got complicated when I chanced on an opportunity with the other girl, the wholesome girl in the same class with the dentist, and found myself in the hazardous situation of having relations with two students that lived at the same place.

My attention span was limited. It could only allow the radar to detect the primped and florid members of the opposite sex. The question is if my art did not suffer for it, and I can’t answer that since it was always in my thoughts and plans, as it is still in my thoughts and plans today. In those San Francisco nights, I delineated my desires in black ink, even if I never brought my art to any public purpose. My contemplations in art arrived at ten at night (if I had nothing else going), and they ceased when I finally went to bed, allowing me nothing more than four hours a night of sleep. Four was all I required in those days. Upon waking, my every moment in public was once again arrested by the possibilities that strode into my panorama. Girls, girls, and more girls surrounded my senses, preoccupied my thoughts on the streets and in the cafes and bars of the city. While I was striding and gazing, my art encapsulated nothing more than a thought balloon I tried to take with me everywhere I went.

That was who I was back then, and I am sure it is still informing who I am today. Even if such drives are the farthest thing from me, they have left their tracks on the pattern of my personality. The drives have turned me around, they have changed me to the point that I am averse to that old behavior — I am now a social aberration, not interested in people at all.

Why don’t you go out and meet some friends? I hear this once in a while, from my wife or from other loved ones. This is solid advice, but the time to meet friends is when you are in the right setting for such interactions to happen naturally or when you are overflowing with warmth. I have neither. My friends are the ones I’ve lost touch with. My only connection to these situations are memories teaming with faces and actions, noises and atmosphere, and they are mixing here and now with these pictures on my computer screen.

Mingling with the pleasure is disappointment at how these former students have changed, how we all lost contact, going back to our respective hometowns around the world or artificially continuing the adventure, never stopping, only changing the surroundings and the people, but still upholding that style of life with aging features, like my old colleague who responded thusly to the aesthetician. Where did we all go and what has happened to that time together? It was a time for some of us but not for all of us. You have to have a mind stuffed with nothing so that you can enjoy it, like Mari, the girl who was now a woman in her mid-thirties, as the pictures proved.

Look at her and how vibrant she still looks, how youthful! Still, there is age there, as there is more tellingly in some of the other women I remember with that kind of fondness. The blurry pictures are them as I remember them but the clearer ones, the ones that have the smiles unchecked and the makeup reacting to the flash of the camera, the signs of more life ten years after the fact are impressed upon your imagination, and they say that if you met them in person again, they would really be different from before.

Mari’s image was going through cycles of now a concert and then a concert somewhere else, in darkness with bad flash photography, and then trying a costume and scratching at the viewer like a cat, and then hiding behind an ice cream cone and winking simultaneously. There was nothing that ceased her life, that simple way to go about these moments, without thought or repercussion.

That electricity that coursed through all of us, joining us, bringing together even the ones we didn’t like, and how we loved it and hated it and did everything by it, on weekends, at bars, after class to form good times and not to advance your career path, but to really have a good time, something meaningless and forgotten the next week when you were out again with some of the same people along with some new ones, and then forgetting about things from a month ago, when you were really into somebody then, until she did something to turn you off or to break your heart. How there was somebody else now in your vision and you were wondering how she was going to like you, what she was like. Then, years later, it is the forgotten stuff that one day creeps up on you and your settled life when you are finding a few web pages you shouldn’t have wasted your time on, and it all comes back — the empty life you once led, and you never regret a moment of these events, these moments that now brought you here, to this place that lacks the gift of curiosity, that brings more peace and less anxiety over questions of what are the good things in life. Everything has settled and it is difficult to get these things flying around like leaves again because they are damp, heavier and harder to throw than they used to be when they were still swirling around.

Back then as now, when you moved from hope to hope, giving up on the stuff that was coming away too far from your grasp and looking for a reason why you never needed it anyway, you conclude that it could have been easy — but it was never easy.

 

— Rey Armenteros

Leave a comment | Categories: Essay | Tags: ,

Picasso This and That (first published in Lunch Ticket)

25 January 2024 by Rey Armenteros

Hated Picasso. I’d never seen anything like it. Something on TV one day made Abuela Marina ask me if I didn’t like Picasso. That word was familiar, like other words that had always been around but that a kid did not expect himself to know. Words like ecstasy, agitation, Picasso. Picasso was about art, and that was all I knew. Abuela didn’t like it, and I could sense it would be nice if I didn’t like it either, to be in the same camp. So, she asked me. I was staring at the TV. I was looking at something I had never seen before.

I was into comic books and the art found there. That other stuff was either landscapes or paintings of people. Not my thing. But this Picasso, this word I must have always known but never really knew was not playing by any rules I accepted. Did I like him? Absolutely not!

One day, I had to study him. This was years later. Him and a bunch of other… frauds. People that were making a joke about everything we valued. I was starting to understand that for me, the type of art you hung on walls was okay until a certain point in art history. Everything was okay until the Impressionists came along. They were okay too, but they somehow created a parallel world for possibilities in art. Impressionists paintings were blurry but somehow attractive. They gave everybody that came after a license to not just make things blurry but twisted. Garish. Unreal. Ugly. It was something that Impressionists did that propelled the people that came after to go off into unreasonable extremes. The next movement would be crazier than the last. And then, the next one even crazier. And it was irreversible. Nothing was ever the same again.

After the Impressionists, there was Van Gogh. And I thought I liked him, but then I wasn’t so sure. Starry Night was palatable. Strange, yes, but easy to understand in its own way. But then Van Gogh had the other stuff. Warped bedrooms and crows slapped together with black slashes of thick paint. This other Van Gogh art was not quite right. And neither was he, so the art history professor explained. He was unhinged, which might have been that thing that made him do what he did — not just the way he painted, but the self-mutilation and his ingesting oil paint at the asylum and his eventual suicide. It was like reality itself was dissolving and fusing in those intense colors he chose. And artists thereafter were trying to change our reality through paint. To reflect the world getting unhinged, I suppose. It was a roving parade of hilarious madness.

A long list of names I had to memorize to take my final exams, names belonging to those trying their utmost to shock the public into some kind of submission that told me one thing: this horde was out there hating everything we loved.

It was inevitable that I would one day accept it. At school, everybody seemed to like the Modernists, except me. Enough talk in that direction made me rethink my preferences. A part of it was that there was something thoroughly uncool about rejecting rebellious art. And I wanted to retain whatever level of cool I had — I could afford losing anything else but not my cool. I was trying to understand this art, to actually like it. I was convincing myself. I was playing the part of the contemporary art student that embraces such stuff. I was even trying to deconstruct it in the studio, trying to paint like some of the Expressionists. It was easier than painting like Leonardo da Vinci. Easier to finish an Expressionistic painting, at least, because there was not as much to it.

I was never one to finish anything. As soon as I lost interest or hit a barrier when working on something, I was willing and able to drop whatever I was working on and start something new. This large flaw in my artistic character was an embarrassment I didn’t even acknowledge. I mean, I couldn’t even finish books I would start reading. When teachers assigned something to read, I’d give up. It was too much to focus on. Seemed like the only thing I could finish was a TV show. As a creator, I was negligent. Never finished creating my comic book projects except for one 32-page fantasy comic book I did the summer before opening my mind to Expressionism.

This Modernism I was being exposed to. Now talking Kandinsky, about how nonrepresentational painting was in fact as hard as anything else. I wanted to believe it. Trying to be someone I wasn’t. All that art history.

I graduated from the university and threw that knowledge straight out the window, at the four winds. I didn’t need it. I wanted to learn about other things. Started buying books. Getting serious. Literature and books that were supposed to be great — the classics. The bargain books were all I could afford. Not just literature but stuff about history and philosophy.

I don’t know how I did it. I had an obsessive streak in me that I could put to use. Somehow, I flipped it around and put it to work on the books I was reading. It didn’t matter if I understood what a page was saying. I moved on if I didn’t understand. Determined to finish every book no matter what. And it worked!

I was even hell-bent on finishing crappy books. If I started it, I was going to finish it. I was actually proud of this. So unlike the me from before.

About two years after graduation, I picked up a slim volume on the story of art for three dollars. To freshen up on my art history. For some reason I can’t remember now, I felt that I did not want to lose any of that information.

I got comfortable and started on page one. It was easy reading, and I found that art history was becoming a delight. I was getting to the end of the book where Modernism was lurking, waiting for me. I now knew what was coming, but I was going to read it anyway. Because that was the kind of guy I now was. And as I read along, the new shock Picasso and the Modernists gave me was unlike the first one. Just two years out, and here I was reminiscing about my time in those classes, gazing at the rough portrait of Madame Matisse with the green stripe on her face as if it were an old friend. Those poisonous images that forced me to pitch invectives at them now gave me warm feelings of darkened classrooms with slide projections and accompanying stories of these maverick artists, while I sat in the back of the room, sketching on margins. Coming up with some of the best comic book stories I would ever have. Listening to somebody going on about creative impetus in a radically changing world, and me half-listening and administering a mixture of post-pubescent heroic ideas to my own would-be works. Those senseless works of famous art became integral to my beloved ballpoint plans — at least by personal association. Back in the days when I couldn’t finish a goddamn thing.

Picasso this. Picasso that. Picasso could do everything. Picasso was the best drawer. Picasso was a prodigy. Picasso was a son of a bitch. A  good-for-nothing womanizer. Picasso, and more Picasso. Picasso was the only name that came up for anybody that knew almost nothing about art. The most famous name in art, the artist people used when people said they couldn’t draw because they were not a Picasso. Or for the opposite, that their kid could draw better than Picasso. That everything he made was crazy. He couldn’t draw a straight line if he had a ruler. As stated by many a casual observer.

His name meant so much to everybody, it seemed. “Look at this guy! We got a Picasso!” Told to me, over and over, when somebody was excited by something I had done.

I was not Picasso. Nothing like him. I wanted to smile, because I knew what the person meant. A compliment, certainly. So I smiled. Even if I wanted to correct them.

Flipping through this book. Remembering what was significant about Picasso. Now I knew and found that I was part of the club — the club of knowing. I knew just what the writer intended for me to understand, because I had already tread that ground. I was now on the inside, and these small facts were now mine as well as those of the book’s writer and my past teachers. It was mine, and I could even pass on this information to somebody else.

“You don’t have to like him,” I found myself saying to laypeople that hadn’t the foggiest clue about Picasso. “But this is what makes him significant.” He flattened the picture plane. He gave different angles in one picture so that you could see the back of someone’s head at the same time that you were looking at the front. He invented new ways to encapsulate human figures. He broke every rule, but he did it while following other rules. He was a part of almost every Modernist movement, adding his impressive contributions every time the art world changed. And he could also draw better than anybody in his day. He was classically-trained. He just chose not to go in that direction. It was a matter of choice. And I was trying to give the idea that there was something commendable about this, because that was the way I was starting to feel.

Back at the bookstore one day, there appeared a Picasso biography in the bargain books. $5.99 plus tax. I shrugged; I would at the very least learn something.

Four hundred pages later, when I put that book down, I made a decision. I decided I was now enlightened. Picasso, I declared, was thereafter someone to admire — one of my heroes! And that opened up the gates for all the other artists I hated. My giving them my time. A chance. Revisiting each one. Finding out if I liked them or not, based on whether their art spoke to me. And not on prejudices about what is proper art. It opened up my world. And then I wanted everyone to be like me — not to think like me — but at least to give every artist the benefit of the doubt.

I still love Picasso. Like I love a great many artists I hated. It is no longer about nostalgia or about wanting to belong to the crowd. It is about going beyond and finding that there is something that has nothing to do with what you thought you knew and what you thought you loved.

 

— Rey Armenteros

Leave a comment | Categories: Essay | Tags: ,

Losers, Chicks, and Secret Identities – Part Two (first published in The Doctor T. J. Eckleburg Review

08 December 2023 by Rey Armenteros

ABROAD

There was a girl in one of our classes. Marisa looked out of place. Her style was all wrong. I mean, it reminded me of the late 1970s, when frizzy hair was left unchecked. It reminded me of the old neighborhood, a working class black part of town I used to live in, and she might have been part black herself. She sported a look I knew well, that casual pep from the street musicals of the late 1970s, that faddish rant from gritty street gang movies from the same era. This was only her look, mind you, because she was actually quiet, unobtrusive.

I could still picture her today with those features that made her peculiar to me. She had her tight curly hair pulled back in a bun. Her nose was not that long but it went forward, like the rest of her profile, as if her head were aerodynamic. I was attracted to her for that one semester, and I didn’t know why.

I would sneak glances at her while she was drawing. Besides looking at her, I didn’t know what else to do with her. How would I know? Such adventures went beyond the stock of my experiences. I didn’t even have the awareness to know that taking a girl out on a date required money, and that was the one notch in the armor of my public persona that would have dismantled my entire tough guy act.

We would sit next to each other, talk polite matters about drawing and those kinds of things. I was never too forward, but I sometimes softly expressed an opinion or two. She also had the same negative views of modern art I had, and it made me feel strange being in the same camp as this alien girl I found disturbing but attractive nonetheless.

The clearest words I can bring back from the distance of years and years that still belong to her (without any invented turns of phrase or embellishments) was the time our model in this figure drawing class we were taking was a rangy man who had all the qualities of a heroic protagonist. This man was a tall, handsome cowboy type with a chiseled body, and he was posing in the nude. “Finally, muscles!” I thought, after half a semester of drawing fatty women and old men. This would be great practice for the heroes I would bring to life in my own comic stories!

Yet, something about this male pseudo-champion was not quite right. His facial expression surrendered the idea that he was off in other worlds, as if he had no recollection that he were in a class with twenty-five people looking at his johnson; he was watching the floor as if scanning for the three square meals he was promised for this modeling gig. If I can jump to conclusions for a minute, I would say he started looking a little like he had a dormant mental illness, and it must have been obvious to every single person carefully watching him as they were drawing these features, even through the muscles and heroic proportions he was bringing to the table. There was a moment when this man started laughing to himself in the middle of his pose. Nobody said anything except this Marisa person, who mentioned, “He’s cracking up!”

And those were her exact words, unexpurgated, perfectly recreated here. Quote, He’s cracking up, end quote.

Now for years, I interpreted this to mean that this strange artist’s model was going insane. One day, years after the fact, it dawned on me that what she likely meant was merely that he was laughing, just a throwaway comment with no qualitative conclusions. I was coloring it with my own perceptions of the man. And it made me wonder if I were the only one in the room who felt there was something wrong with our fearless model.

And it made me wonder about her too, after the fact. Through the safe topics about drawing utensils and about the traffic on the way over to school, the few words we wasted on each other were still words, and yet we may have never been communicating on any level, even the most prosaic. What would the audacity of modern art mean for her when it meant certain things for me? If such art were repugnant to me because of reasons I couldn’t even explain, what could it have been for her? I am now sure we were not talking about the same things.

I must have known that from the start. We were totally incompatible; even my foolish eighteen-year old mind must have come to that conclusion. And yet I was still drawn to her, and I worried about what she thought about me. I don’t think Marisa knew Gabriel, but I can vaguely detect a memory still dog paddling in my brain about how the three of us were hanging out in the hall during a break and suddenly he pulls out a comic book from his backpack and how I performed immediate evasive maneuvers by stepping out of the hall without a word to either of them. I just couldn’t let her know about my shameful, secret love affair with comic books.

In the light of not understanding Marisa or the heroic model who could have been neurotic or not, maybe Eddie Castro and I were the only ones that thought Gabriel was indiscrete about his favorite subject of conversation. It could be possible that we were the exceptions and not Gabriel. Maybe any other collector would have thought Gabriel was normal and that what he did was a-okay. I have met some people like Gabriel over the years. So, I will admit that Gabriel’s talk might not have been as out there as Eddie and I concluded.

On the other hand, Gabriel knew what he was doing, and I feel some part of him must have enjoyed our stifled reactions. Gabriel, I have no doubt, was not just bringing up this questionable topic because he wanted to; he was doing it to be outré. I’m almost sure of it.

I don’t know. We were never really that close. Gabriel came to my house just one time. I don’t remember what the occasion was, but he was checking out my comic collection. I was saving the crown jewel of my possessions for last. It was a well-kept copy of Journey into Mystery 83, when Thor makes his first appearance — worth almost a thousand dollars in those days. When the time came, I pulled it from the back of the long box and displayed it almost with a flourish. Expecting surprise, I got nothing of the kind. His reaction surprised me!

He was appalled; he couldn’t believe I kept this thing in a yellowed bag. I looked, didn’t understand what he was talking about, and then spotted the evidence. Until that moment, I never noticed the stained surface of the bag, as if it were doused in nicotine. In fact, all my bags were yellowed. And right there, he stated that yellow bags would indubitably age the comics instead of preserve them. “And you can’t just bag them, you have to board them too,” he advised. Boards kept comics rigid so that they wouldn’t bend in the box.

I didn’t have the money for this extravagance. But what choice did I have! Soon, I was at Sunny Comics. I bought hundreds of bags but without the boards. At the time, I had about a thousand five hundred comics and so could only rebag about a quarter of my comics, the best of my collection. When I noticed four hundred bags was not going to be enough for my very best, I was back at Sunny, forking over more dough and feeling regret about the whole thing — no, feeling remorse, as if I were doing something wrong.

In later years, nevertheless, I would lament not buying the boards.

There is an elementary drive in this behavior. To be a collector, you have to be meticulous. Meticulous boys are picky about what they eat, who they hang out with, and the girls they like.

That was why a girl like Marisa… I don’t know. What could I have seen in her? Yes, I admit, I was reluctantly into her, but I don’t think anything could have come of it, even if she returned her interest in me. My tough guy persona would have come apart after too much wear and tear in directions I had zero experience in, when finally landing my space fleet of ideas and preconceived notions on unknown worlds and discovering more about myself than about the new terrain. The fact that my weapon systems were inoperable due to malfunctions created from prejudices developed years before, when the space fleet was first being assembled. As soon as the hatch door opened, the tough hero would have cracked at the extremities before completely crumbling under the weight of this new atmosphere, the visage of this alien woman cooly peering through the smoke and debris with an expression that meant, “I thought so.”

That hypothetical debacle never happened because Marisa and I never allowed it to go there. And after that one class with her, what became of Marisa?

Though I should have expected to see her again in a school whose art department was so small, I actually never did, until two years later when she walked into Kinko’s, the Copy Center. I was on the job, and so I had to go over and ask if she needed help with the photocopier. We started talking about what she needed as a customer. The most amazing thing was that neither one of us acknowledged that we were once acquainted. It was like nobody wanted to admit those drawing class days ever happened.

The art of snubbing someone was a valid sport in that decade of Reaganomics and action movies. This was wisdom grown in the shopping mall where you might say hi to someone you knew and that person would walk past you. If anything sums up the attitude of those days, it was this constant snubbing that happened between people who were often doing it because they didn’t want to be snubbed in turn. So snubbing someone was a preemptive strike, just in case! It was clearly an Eighties thing and something that is so alien to society today, that we only know about and use the word in conjunction with celebrities and the crude things they do to one another. But those days were different. And Marisa?… I don’t know. We were pretending not to know each other. In that sense, we finally understood each other.

That world we were coming from was just no good; I knew it beyond a shadow of a doubt. This was not just about working class neighborhoods, girls that ignored you in and out of the shopping mall, or people that didn’t respect people who read comics. I was looking at the big picture, as it was being presented to me in art school, how these Modernists could do whatever they like, slap it with a label that came with a steep price, and make a killing off of calling every single inanity art. It was about the inescapable rising rate of crime and the way corruption was just an accepted fact at all levels of politics, legal matters, and large businesses. It was about all the other things I was learning in school and in life and not liking it one bit. Like I escaped in my comics, I sought a real escape in other places. I started recognizing that beyond this nation of insulters and thieves, utopia existed.

During my time as a closet geek, I found my salvation in a paradise that was located in a faraway land I kept reading about. In addition to homegrown comics, I had also been a manga and anime buff long before the hordes took over and made these Japanese forms into American mainstream cultural properties. I learned that Japan was a land that had an open policy on comics, where everyone read comics, and where comics were not relegated to the kids. In Japan, comics were everywhere! On top of that, it had the other qualities every utopia had to have: there was hardly any crime, and everyone was polite to everyone else. This was a very special place, and I swore I would one day go.

I never thought it would happen, but one day it did. I found a job, made a decision, and was off within three months of that decision. Escape! Finally. Yes, but no. Everything they wrote about Japan was true, but it was not true in the way that I had inferred it. Yes, everyone read comics and they were everywhere, but this birthplace of the “otaku” (the maniac fan) was different from what the promoters of these ideas were feeding us. Yes, comics were important to the fans, who were in greater numbers (though no less meek and quiet) than they were here, but comics were far less essential to the businessmen and housewives, who were also target audiences. Everybody was reading comics on the trains (out in the open and without shame, regardless of the panels containing asinine toilet humor or women in lewd positions), but they were also tossing them as soon as they had finished, like any other form of throwaway entertainment. Even if almost everybody read them, that didn’t mean they were respected. And there were many Japanese that didn’t touch the stuff. Every time I asked about manga to a Japanese acquaintance, the regular response was, “What? Oh that.” Nobody I knew actually read them.

The grand irony about all this is that by the time I made it to Japan, I wasn’t reading them either; I had long given up on comics. I was no longer a real fan. The stories were lackluster, the same old crap. The art was being churned out according to contemporary industry standards. And my art submissions had been rejected one too many times. How could I still be into them after having concluded one day that it was just another money-making industry? It was fitting that I would finally make it to Japan, but about ten years too late.

Other than that, nothing changed. The dire fact was that so many years after the era of snubbing and so many miles away from the effrontery of nonbelievers, I still had no friends. I mean, I knew all sorts of people. I was out all the time. I had romantic adventures. There was danger and even the occasional episode I filed away in my brain as an encounter with the supernatural. But the people I knew in Japan were no different, when you took out the social mores and the other cultural distinctions. In Japan, you had to work your ass off, and you learned to appreciate the short time you had to have fun. The relationships I pursued could never get beyond a certain superficiality.

Was it lack of communication or understanding? That was a social ailment that seemed to be following me for so many years of my life that I was not surprised to also find it here.

Now that I was in the land of my dreams, I could no longer go up to a girl and start talking to her because, for one thing, she probably didn’t want to converse in English if she knew it at all. And for another, this was not the way things were done here. In addition, I was a foreigner, which was not necessarily a plus or minus but certainly a stumbling block for most people to overcome.

The only way I could meet a girl was by using social internet sites that left listings. The pretense was that it was going to be a language exchange. “Young Japanese lady willing to meet foreigner for language exchange. Would like to talk about movies and life in America. Hobbies: watching movies and going out with friends.” Though it might have been hanging there in the background, there was never any mention of sex.

With sex on my mind and no longer associating myself with comics, I would tell a date that I was not only an ESL teacher, but I was also an artist. And this went over a lot better than, “I’m an aspiring comic book artist.”

I would tell girls that I wanted to draw them, and they would always be flattered. It was always bullshit. In those days, I no longer drew from models. In my art, I would make stuff up and allow my notions of reality to come through without seeking them in the details of the world. Asking them to pose was just my way of getting them back to my place. And it never worked.

I lived in Kanagawa, and I worked in Tokyo. In one more twist of irony, even though I had quit comics years before, I would still find myself digging in the garbage tanks for comics that were laid out on Sunday night for the garbage men to collect the next day. Though I shunned them, I still loved them. What did I feel about stepping into a dumpster in plain view? Where was my old sense of propriety? In this faraway world where no one knew you, you would never give a shit about who saw you lurking in the trash to get these otaku treasures. There was only one person, and that was my flatmate, the nicest guy from Ohio, and he never said a thing about what I would haul into my room. But by then, with the passing of enough years, I could hardly give a shit about anything anyway. So, in my tiny room, I would gather piles of this stuff I couldn’t even read in order to find some meaning in all of it, in order to get inspired, in order to sustain and feed my voyeuristic appetites. I was looking for violence and naked women doing stuff they never did in our comics, and at times, I’d strike gold when an inventive art style shaped perversions in situations implied solely through the panel progression. And it inspired my own vision in the drawings I was making, drawings that were debilitated by sex and violence.

What was the connection between my art and my interminable love affair with comics? Though I was plumbing the depths of all manner of comic book imagery, these ink paintings of mine did not possess the same consistency we find in comics where an ear is always shaped like an ear, and a head of hair fashioned in such a layered hairstyle would always belong to the same character. Though I had purpose, my drawings allowed too much of the accidental to creep in, and this might have felt less deliberate to the going comic book aficionado. Visual consistency is what fans tacitly required, and thus comics fans, though familiar with the type of imagery I was making, might not have understood where my art was coming from. This artwork from this very special time was therefore larger than life for me; as a viewer, you either got it or you didn’t, and I was now at that point in my career when I didn’t care if you got it or not.

Long having given up on trying to make it into comics, I was now working freeform with the images that would occur to me. Those dumpster comics did their part in inspiring me, and I was coming up with the most inventive drawings of my life, mixing the scattered techniques I had picked up in art school with the vile imagery I was absorbing from my piles of manga.

In drawing a naked werewolf who was splaying his limbs and throwing flourishes of gore, I was depicting the aftermath of one of his square meals, and I was carving muscle detail on the long corded arms, the sharply-defined torso, the lanky legs — even delineating the veins on his dangling testicles. I immediately dubbed the ink drawing Werewolf Balls and still hold it in higher esteem than most anything I have ever made.

I would use ruined brushes to stamp splotches of ink that intimated faces and would then get a fine brush to bring out the features, taking advantage of the things that would come up at a moment’s notice when the ink mixed with the water in unpredictable ways. Such chaotic combinations might offer me seven robotic animal humanoids all in a row or provocative poses from people I thought were women, but actually today look to me androgynous.

These new drawings stank with life, and the sour flavors they may have formed in most palates were standing in for whatever notions of success I had had till then. Success, for me at this juncture, was nothing more than total freedom to make the art I wanted, and viewer reactions be damned! The only losers in art were those that expected anything else.

There was nothing textbook about this. And most people that knew I was an artist didn’t get to see my work anyway, though they might have expressed interest. (I almost never showed my artwork to anybody.) Yet, if someone asked about my art, I would unflinchingly go into the starkly scented lechery of it all by providing discourse that was cemented in art school but that really had its origins in the theories and language from those Bill Blackbeard days of long before. As much as I might have resisted this scholarly attitude, the mere voicing of any explanations on these visceral energies almost demanded an academic vocabulary.

Though I was lonely, I was living it up as an artist within the small hole of my traditional tatami room in an insignificant corner of Kawasaki City, like a Heian Period scholar from of old, brush in hand contemplating the rice paper. Equipped with a traditional table, I even sat in the same manner as an ancient poet or landscape painter, effectively completing the image of this corny metaphor.

Planning to live there indefinitely, I was in Japan for that one year and was inundated with many optical wonders, but in the end of it, I was done with the Japanese version of everything that life had to give. Ultimately, my disillusion with Japan was all my own doing because words and images in the old books about Japanese comics can never catch the totality of any reality we find — and Japan made itself my own personal reality, even if I never wanted one.

Escaping from reality was the theme of my life. Now that I had escaped from one side of the planet, I found that I became a foreigner and still tried to escape on the other side. What else could I be but a foreigner in Japan? The hypothesis here is this: If you feel like a foreigner, then you will live like one. Was there any other possibility?

Was there? Now, I’m not so sure. I sit here and contemplate that question as if it backfired and hit me in the face. When I asked that question of possibilities just now, did I intend to answer it or was it a rhetorical question? It was supposed to be the latter, but I sit here and consider it, turning it around, like it seems I’ve done with everything in my life. If there is an answer, I would like to try to search for it in that period of my two-year college experience, now that my mind is lingering on these memories, and perhaps find it in Gabriel.

The last time I saw Gabriel on campus, he was going to move, to another school or city — I can’t remember. He was pulling out action figures in broad daylight, telling me he was going to the art supply store for enamel paints, the kind you used for model cars.

The action figures and the model paint — they weren’t equating anything for me, so I asked him why. He said he was going to paint their scratched surfaces to make them new again.

I must have looked dumbfounded. It never entered my head you could do something like that. I too still had a couple of action figures, and I kept impeccable care of them, but when the brown paint scratched off the hair revealing a head with what looked like thinning hair, I never thought you could rewind time and give him a full head of hair again with enamel color.

Where would he ever get an idea like that? I came away from that episode wondering why Gabriel didn’t walk the line like everybody else. To survive a social climate, I have always believed that you needed to present what is socially acceptable while simultaneously hiding those features that are only yours and hence unexpected to the greater world. I know I walked the line because I would partake in what gave meaning to my life but I would keep it to myself like a serial killer. Such a person makes up morality on the go since this person has no real interactions with people. And this underscores any delusions I had about myself and the opposite sex, when I was judging them for scorning me at shopping malls in their oversized pullovers and pastel leggings. If I were a foreigner everywhere I went, it was because I was one to myself as well as to others, and what Gabriel would eventually prove to me in hindsight was that you didn’t have to be one to yourself.

Those of us that loved this art form were all foreigners, but each of us engaged with this limitation in his own way. Bill Blackbeard himself must have been a foreigner to the normal people of his day, but that never stopped him from doing what he was doing. Think about the neighbors for a second. At some point in his quest, Blackbeard had an incredible storage problem in his home where he was keeping stacks and bundles of countless newspapers that libraries had given him at his request. The newspapers were clogging his garage and the living spaces in his house, even spilling into his yard. The neighborhood must have known he was holding several truckloads of this stuff on his home premises. What kind of person would they have concluded he was? Who knows, but if they looked long enough into his life, they would find that those very materials were not only used to make numerous compilations of work that otherwise would have been lost to civilization just like the paintings of the Ancient Greeks, but that he later donated this massive collection to the Billy Ireland Cartoon Library and Museum, where scholars and archivists today find rare works that are now designated as emblems of our national culture.

The only way you can become a Bill Blackbeard is to take your convictions and do what you feel is right, even if the rest of the world might judge you in unattractive ways. I know where Gabriel stood on the social parameters he was given, and I wonder what accomplishments he has done with his audacity, but it also makes me wonder about Eddie Castro; how would he have dealt with thinning hair on an old, plastic hero? I wonder if Eddie still enjoys comics, or if it was a passing thing, as it has been for so many youthful collectors from my day — a thing you did before you got into chicks and fast cars.

 

— Rey Armenteros

Leave a comment | Categories: Essay | Tags: ,

Losers, Chicks, and Secret Identities – Part One (first published in The Doctor T. J. Eckleburg Review

27 November 2023 by Rey Armenteros

COLLEGE

It was dread. Social disaster was what I was facing if my secret ever got out. Few people would understand my dilemma. Almost nobody knew about this disreputable passion, because I was very good at hiding it, but it was always there in the background. My comic book collection was my very own treasure horde, and I locked it away like an art collector. This was not about covetous hands; the real fear lay in letting people know that I identified with this passion in the first place. The only instances when I voluntarily exposed my hidden love for comics outside the walls of my home was every time I entered a comic book store to get something fundamental in me fulfilled.

You sacrificed some semblance of self as a comic book fan back in the day. You were an outsider, some kind of weirdo. Looking around at the monstrous success garnered by the industry today, you would at least think it unlikely. My wife thinks I’m exaggerating when I declare that in those days, we comic book fans had to hide. We, the unprofessed and reluctant “geeks,” would keep that stuff in a distant corner of our lives, unknowingly leading the secret identity you read about in the actual comic books we were collecting. Superheroes were all about secret identities, and when Spiderman changed back to the nerdy Peter Parker, it was a leap across fantasy and straight into the reality of almost every fan that was reading such stuff.

We call them geeks now, but it was far more universal back then to call such people losers. And I was no loser. The such and such person that I thought of myself was nothing like the type that yearned for the art and stories and that carefully collected these flimsy things in bags in order to preserve their condition. I looked at myself as a tough guy, the quiet type. A loner whose mysterious qualities eventually had the ability to attract girls — if they ever got close enough. These were the things I had to tell myself for me to get as far away from that other world as possible.

The occasions when I had to enter the neighborhood comic book store certainly came with mixed feelings. What got me most uncomfortable was getting out of my mom’s car and showing any prospective passerby that I was entering a comic book store. Sunny Comics was a couple of miles from my house, and the real reason I didn’t go all that much was that I didn’t have enough money. The hardcore fans would dump all their money into this hobby, which meant they spent it on nothing else, unwittingly wearing the same T-shirts and jeans through most of their young adult lives. This hobby needed certain amounts of purchasing power, because beyond the flimsy magazine-style comics, nothing was cheap, and I was lucky if I had pocket change for this or for anything else. And this picture of the man without money would have amounted to another characteristic of a loser in the decade of the 1980s.

Sunny Comics! How to describe this place? The store itself was unpleasant with its dusty disorderliness and funky smell, and it gave negative appeal to staying longer than you needed. But that did not deter me; stay longer I did. For an hour or more, I would bask in the wonders you could find nowhere else. The comic book store was the only place to find such rarities, designer toys and art books in limited print runs, graphic novels that you had no idea existed. I would recognize an artist’s style or characters on the cover, and that was all I needed. And that was all I was going to get, because the cover was the only thing on display. Every book and comic magazine came in a plastic bag sealed with tape, and I was not the type to open one and risk a sharp retort from the register. Outside the regular monthly comic books I’d buy, every purchase was a gamble; you either got something incredible or something not so great.

The store was run by a family that allowed lounging floorspace for their several dogs. The dogs were so quiet, you sometimes stepped on a paw before you noticed it was there. The family appeared as if running this store were a drudgery, and any questions directed at them would be met with the same stare of weary indignation.

The old lady in charge had that one expression permanently stamped on her face, but at least she was pretty knowledgable. She always knew what was coming, when, and by whom. There was the day the industry came to a sudden halt — nothing was on the shelves! I slowly made my way to the counter and politely got her attention in order to ask her why. Before I said a word, she was already explaining that an entire month’s worth of issues was delayed because of a fire that had wrecked the color separation sweatshop where almost all the publishers did their business. I think I was shocked, and I might have told her it was shocking, or something like that, just to say something. But I wasn’t adding it up until later. One fire could wreck everything I looked forward to! And her information eventually gave me a twisted glimpse at the incestuous relationships these publishing competitors actually enjoyed. All of them used the same color separator, and thus all of them were late with their titles that one summer.

Another characteristic of a loser was a lack of friends. I liked to believe I knew a lot of people, but who were the people I actually felt close to? And how many of these people were into comics?

I did hang out in those days with a college friend on campus who was a diehard fan. He talked the lingo, and it was cool to have someone who understood the ins and outs of these incredible stories. The problem with Gabriel was that he had no sense of propriety. There’s a certain time and place to bring this subject up, and he didn’t get it. Like me, Gabriel was a Cuban kid, sort of a cross between a dork and a lawyer at the golf course with his clean haircut and glasses. That problem of his was he had that temerity that lived in so few of us to talk about comics in front of anybody, anywhere. He wanted to chat about it in classrooms and halls, talking about the storylines and the art. He would do all the talking, and I would take furtive glances around me to see if anyone I knew were anywhere near our vicinity.

I knew better than to come out with this hobby in plain view of a society that scorned it. Though I loved this fake, plastic world that I concocted around me with the help of cues from action figures and the inspiration of comic books, I was never stupid enough to advertise it. It was a guilty love, much like that kind you might have for someone who you were simultaneously ashamed of, like a stupid-looking chum or a girl you liked that everybody thought was ugly.

Gabriel and I, one day, were sitting with a group of his friends in that hangout spot that every two-year college seems to have, and there were about three or four attractive girls present. I didn’t know them. They were people he knew. They were all done up in their shopping mall attire, and for this one brief moment, I was in a social circle with hot chicks! They were snickering at some other girl walking by in leg warmers and high heels; the fashion faux pas that poor girl had committed was lost on me but it was obvious to every offended lady at the table. And this is the setting that Gabriel chose to bring up Wolverine, Kitty Pryde, and the rest of the X-Men.

I was struck with the likelihood that my own secret identity, even among these strangers, was going to be compromised. My tough guy public persona was on the verge of collapsing. I was frozen on the spot, training my eyes solely on Gabriel, trying not to look at the group reaction to this ludicrous conversation. To my horror, one of the hot girls turned to us and asked us who Kitty Pryde was, wondering if we were gossiping about soap operas. My friend looked at her with his wry smile and said, “Something like that.”

What the hell was wrong with him! What if she put two and two together? Didn’t he know chicks don’t dig comics?

No, chicks didn’t dig comics. But if I thought about it for a second, what the hell did I know about chicks? And wasn’t he the one with all these female friends in the first place? I wasn’t adding it up back then, but maybe Gabriel didn’t want to give in to a double life. He might have been the type to have backbone, the kind of person that really didn’t care what others thought of him. Commendable, I think, especially now when I look back on it all. I could have taken some pointers from him, but if I were honest — I didn’t have the balls.

I didn’t know anybody like Gabriel. I only knew one other guy at school with the same interests who had the good sense to keep it to himself like I did. The only time Eddie Castro and I would talk about these matters was at the bus stop in front of campus in lowered voices, with no one around. Like spies, we would mutter about the John Byrne years doing the X-Men or scratch our heads at Frank Miller’s deviation to a sketchy drawing style in that Batman graphic novel that was in all the actual bookstores. Eddie also knew Gabriel, but I don’t think he knew him very well. I may have introduced them for all I remember. He had the same reactions to him that I had, awed by how Gabriel could bring up the superhero names and their powers in public, along with the rest of the alphabet of superhero trivia without flinching, making the alter egos that sounded so very cool as you were reading their exploits with your inner voice seem so ridiculous out in the stratosphere of aspirated syllables and actual reality. Shaking his head and shrugging his shoulders, Eddie would say, “Gabriel is cool and shit, but he just doesn’t get it. I’m like I love talking about Spiderman and Wolverine,” and Eddie would point to the ground and say, “but not right now, man.”

That two-year college was the center of my life for both those years. I hardly had a friend (a real friend), and I barely knew a single girl, but I had high hopes anyway. And it was no accident that as an art student, I was learning more at the college about the history of comics than about the art of the Renaissance. Between classes I would spend an hour at the campus library, sneaking around the shelves, looking for anything that looked interesting — autobiographies that read like novels, how-to books on making movies. One day, I found large books that depicted the history of comics. I didn’t even know comics had a history! I took them home. I was curious about the old art of these newspaper strips and early comic books. Could this musty, old work be any good? A lot of it was rubbery-looking or scratchy. But I found some interesting work that made me pause to think about possibilities in art and stories. These history books were forming ideas in my head. They created a fresh interest in antiquated comic strips from before World War II.

It was not just about the art these books would sample generously in their pages. It was what was said about the work. The writers of these books seemed to be propounding a level of importance and seriousness that I found fascinating. One of these books even equated comics with jazz, claiming that they were the only two true American art forms. These allusions and comparisons armed me with enough tidbits to help me argue the point that comics were indeed important. Now that I knew that comic books should be defended, I embraced the crusade needed to inform the public that this was a valid art form, and I would go on and on about them, even if my audience were limited to close family and one or two friends.

If a comics history book elaborated on the salacious work in the underground comics from the Sixties, I would defend the position why comics had the right to print whatever they liked, promoting the idea that it was in our best interests to allow comics to show naked women, for example. The truth, as I could see it, was that the very best comics — the ones that exhibited the most superlative craft and content — were intended for mature audiences anyway, and that meant that it usually came with naked women. But like I said, my sermons had a limited circulation, and even if it extended beyond the handful of people I harried with these ideas, my powers of argumentative reasoning were underdeveloped.

Regardless, those books opened up my world in ways I was not even aware of. Their hold on me was unforgettable, though I was not too keen on the tone and syntax these writers had to take. And that was the one thing that confused me about these wonderful history books on our American art form. Though I was not going to question the gravity behind those aficionados who would write their introductions and essays on comics with the same sobriety, if not the same verbal manner, as scholars and serious-minded people, it all sounded kind of pretentious. It was something I never dwelt on, but I must have reflected on it once or twice why these “comics historians” would attempt such an academic position on this, their favorite subject.

Not for one minute did I complain about such intellectual diversions with the subject, and actually that seriousness was feeding my own outlook on how the medium was an art form of the very highest order. Nevertheless, these sophisticated forays were making me think of the art history classes and the slide shows and the anecdotes about which fresco painters pissed off which bishops when plopping their painterly messes onto scaffolding and floor.

Was it the same thing? I didn’t think so. I had a lot more love for the art in comics than anything European or religious. In the company of other comic book lovers, I would flagrantly say that Michael Golden was a much better artist than Michelangelo. And my colleague and fellow comic book collector would be like, “Are you crazy!” gasping at such words, because they knew where to draw the line, it seemed, and I was one of those fanatics when I was inspired and inside closed doors, well-hidden and protected from the public, from the outsider opinion, from the real barbarians! In such opportunities, I would tell it as it is! Then, my colleague’s subsequent argument would be that Michelangelo was the very first superhero artist, and he would make links to how Michelangelo informed heroic proportions, how the figure of God was the template for Captain America, and the power and the muscles and all that, but I wasn’t buying it.

It was that scholarly interest that was crossing the fun and personal with that institution of learning subjects such as fine arts, which had apparently been gathering their steam for hundreds of years just to be able to present their slides, anecdotes, and kernels of knowledge to a largely dumb and uninterested audience of youngish students. “Institution” is a good word; it was the institution versus the personal joy.

But that didn’t bother me either. It wasn’t that. Actually, I don’t think anything about their introductions to handsome editions and their argumentative articles about the importance of this work even so much as knotted my brow. But it somehow felt off, as if they were doing something wrong, committing something to be ashamed of, and I was there implicating myself because I was reading it — and believing it!

I am thinking of one of these people, Bill Blackbeard, and the name alone conveyed a certain eccentricity behind the personage — I thought it was a pseudonym. It turned out to be a real name. My first meeting with that name came in the foreword of a hardcover book I felt compelled to buy at Sunny Comics. It was the third volume of the complete Terry and the Pirates by Milton Caniff. Before entering college, I had never heard of Terry and the Pirates, but one of those library books enlightened me about the greatness of this old adventure strip from the 1930s and 40s. Basically, a young American and his ward were having adventures around the war-torn landscape of divided China. This theme was strange to me. Why China? Were all of their adventures set just there? The setting, the absurd title all lent it an idiosyncratic air. Hardcover compilations were coming out in those days. Sunny Comics had some of them. They were $32.50 plus tax, during a time when the saddle-stitched flimsy comics were going for 75 cents. Like I mentioned, I hardly had money for the regular comics, so this money in 1987 for a striving college student was nothing less than grave. But I bought it anyway. In the foreword, Blackbeard goes on about the origins of adventure strips and such stuff.

Apparently, this Bill Blackbeard was important within the right comic strip circles, given how his thoughts prefaced the hardcover I now had. I thought he was an editor or a publisher. It turned out that he was an avid collector of newspaper strips, and when most people were using old newspapers to pad boxes or to roll fish up in, he was carefully clipping the comics sections so that posterity could have a peek at them — so that the artists of that day could have their work somehow preserved. Something I was not aware of was that almost all of the original art had been thrown out because the actual drawings themselves — the sheets of Bristol board that held the India ink drawings — were considered obsolete once printed! It was only in the fugitive newsprint that these gems were saved from vanishing. How else to compile a full story run of a given strip? Someone had to clip them from their printed sources.

Blackbeard was a collector just like me, except he was a man with a mission, and instead of a loser, or a dweeb with a lot of time on his hands, he was considered an “archivist” whose private collections were being published.

Over the years, I would keep running into the name. When I moved to San Francisco, I learned Blackbeard was associated with the Cartoon Museum there. I would encounter interviews of his and slowly acknowledge his inestimable worth to the existence of this work — this work that nobody else cared about, that he single-handedly preserved by going to the libraries at a pivotal time in their history. When microfiche was becoming all the rage and libraries were photographing their periodical collections and then throwing away the originals, it was Bill Blackbeard who came in at the nick of time to save them from destruction! Essentially, if it weren’t for him, I would never have been able to read Terry and the Pirates.

Today, when I read large books detailing the biographies of great cartoonists such as Milton Caniff, I pick up the importance of cartoon scholars and what they have done, and I don’t think twice about it. It helps that the art of the comics is far more respected as a cultural property today than it ever was before. Comic strips may have had their heyday a long time ago, and the comic book industry has progressively shrunk, but today there is more in-depth appreciation for this medium. People are coming out of the woodwork professing they are comic book fans. Even if the industry is shrinking, the present-day creators are getting more money and respect than ever before. The comic book conventions have become such giant events (thanks largely to the movies and video games associated with comic book properties), they are even outgrowing their host cities. If today, you say I like comics, you are considered cool, and there are also more and more ladies getting into them. I would never have seen any of this coming in a hundred years. In my world, it was as impossible as wishing away the nuclear missiles.

 

— Rey Armenteros

Leave a comment | Categories: Essay | Tags: ,

In the Spirit of Trees (first published in Breadcrumbs)

17 October 2023 by Rey Armenteros

When I was reading Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings, I used mental approximations for oaks and elms every time I ran up against them. I would find “oak” in a sentence, and all I knew was tree. My image for oak then was nothing more than a general tree.

Outside of pine trees and palms, I had little notion of what the different types of trees looked like. I was not aware of their seasonal changes — being from Miami, I only knew one season. Tolkien’s rich environment and whatever implied meaning he was driving at was lost on a reader that could never differentiate a maple from an oak.

And yet I love trees! I take notice of them every time they call my attention by a shift of sunlight or by clusters of diverse textures in the distance. I appreciate the grace of branches, and I try to memorize the exact shapes of leaves. I take whatever haphazard details I can recollect back into my studio, and I try to paint the details that remain with me.

But was a branch dark gray or brown? Was there an order of connections that the branch had as it climbed up into the canopy? I could visualize the image, but not every correct element would make it intact. Since I draw and paint from memory, I was under the impressions that understanding what you had seen earlier provides a greater advantage than merely memorizing random details.

I went to the library one day and found a few books on botany. I took them home to go about studying the categorization of plants with seriousness. I was finally going to acquire some understanding about trees.

However, I immediately ran into walls of scientific jargon. A dry text was what I encountered. Keen specificity were the barbs I had to negotiate. The first book didn’t even have a warm introduction to spur me on. Before getting into the good stuff, the general groupings of species and other foundational information was too convoluted for the novice, and forty pages in, I was convinced there was not going to be any “good stuff.”

I had given up, but I had not forgotten. In another part of the country, at another library, some years later, quite by accident, I found a how-to book on painting trees. I was flipping through it, convinced it was just another book on artistic technique when I slowly realized what the author was in fact doing. He was classifying the basic types of trees, grouping each one in two-page spreads, explaining through the point of view of a watercolorist what differences to look for in each type.

Enraptured, I took it home, read each spread carefully, took notes, and committed them to memory. His descriptions of what to look for provided me with building blocks. The structures of things were being decoded for me, and I was dreaming up possibilities for how to use them with my own painting techniques. I was taking my work from memory and infusing it with a system.

However, I soon took this basic knowledge and found myself asking questions, wondering why paint trees when we have real trees all over creation? Here’s a charming little painting by the symbolist Gustav Klimt I find in an art history book, and the trees look so convincing. But do I want to look at Klimt’s lesser known landscapes or see the actual landscape? We assume this is what the trees looked like under such lighting and other conditions. Klimt’s simple, clear landscapes are beautiful, but I feel real trees are so much more than the ones that are raised in the mind’s fancy with his maneuvers in oil paint.

On the other hand, I could be wrong since I have never seen the actual paintings but only photographic reproductions of them. However, regardless of which tree tickles the mind in a more direct manner, Klimt does provide ideas by the way he composes them, the manner in which he paints them, and the colors which he chooses. And these ideas, if still present to someone who had discovered them in his paintings, would bounce off the actual landscape when the time comes to look at an actual tree. And just like how the painted tree can bring up the visual characteristics of a real tree in your head, the real tree may have a tendency of invoking the tree that was made with nothing but paint marks. I know because I have seen such trees once under the same lighting conditions and immediately thought of Klimt.

It is reassuring, but after asking why paint trees, I take a broader view. Why paint anything for that matter? An open doorway within open doorways, a face in the dark?

Here is the glow that rises out of the bedroom at this late hour in the afternoon, and the orange nature of the light is noticed when I step out of the room and find that the orange room frames the blue bathroom like a sky blue rectangle cut into the wall.

I painted this thing a couple of years ago when I was transfixed by the warm and cool tones folding into these rooms. I was recreating the moment from memory. The bedroom is not orange, and the bathroom is not blue; the walls that are merely white were caught in a sunset that turned them into something else. I enjoyed the very idea of this transformation. I painted it with the orange and blue as close as I could remember.

But then, an interesting thing happened. After it was done, I could not help looking at this painting of mine about ephemeral light without acknowledging its quiet purpose lifted and turned into a silent declaration — in my mind, with time, the rectangle of the door in my painting became a long tombstone, and the feeling was now solemn.

And these unexpected ominous overtones brought up a singular beauty that I wasn’t going to get from the real situation of the room in particular lighting conditions. I would like to think that my process of roaming through the depths of memory to resurrect this moment provided the bricks that would turn my quiet experience with the room into something different, something the paint discovered, as if in this room that was a part of my home, the paint found an apparition.

 

— Rey Armenteros

Leave a comment | Categories: Essay | Tags: ,

The Naming of Trees (first published in Cobalt Review)

20 September 2023 by Rey Armenteros

A word is a thing you fill with everything you know about it.

Instead however, a word that sounds familiar but that is actually unclear can shape-shift into something else, granting you the ability to substitute the meaning with almost anything else that comes to mind.

Instead of stopping to look it up, you as the reader may keep going, either ignoring that part of the sentence you couldn’t understand or supplanting the proper meaning with something that might feel right even if it were wrong.

Having never known anything about trees before, I was learning the basics from a watercolor technique book on painting trees. I was now learning the names. I had always invented my own imagery for oak, maple, birch, elm — these words that were familiar to me meant nothing more than some kind of tree. If I encountered one of these words in text or conversation, I would visualize a cluster of leaves over the flows of dark branches without anything to differentiate it from another type of tree.

Thanks to this book on watercoloring trees, now I knew oak branches stick straight out at right angles. Elms have a Y-shape that opens at its fullest in the summer when the leaves retain water, and that tighten up in the winter. The branches of sycamores curve wildly in every direction. Willow branches zigzag, and the foliage occupies the tips of delicate twigs in clusters. Maples have an overall egg shape. The birch has a light-colored bark. The dead branches of a palmetto stay hanging off the trunk like a skirt, unless trimmed, when the stubble takes on the pattern of crackle.

As an artist, I have my own ways, and rather than offering me techniques, the author’s watercolors were diagrams of information for me to memorize and recognize in real trees.

Now that I was learning the characteristics that went with these names, I would ask myself if I could hold them to memory better? Do I need to know the oak to paint it later in the studio? Does that one word help? I paint from memory and not from direct observation. If I now knew the names of trees, can I paint them with more authority?

But this was my next question: if I’m painting from memory, wouldn’t it be better to allow memory to do what it does best? If I am making sure the branches of an oak are obviously at right angles to a viewer, am I making more of a diagram and less of a painting? In spite of my wonderful trip through this informative book, it was becoming clear to me that my art was never about getting it right but about capturing the residue of a moment. This matter about the proper vestments for trees corrals me into thinking that there is only one approach available, and even with the informative points this book has to offer, I am starting to have doubts.

Often it is the technical approach that gets me coming up with figures and landscapes. That means I might not even know what I’m painting half the time before something starts showing up on the painting’s surface. I’ll play with paint and find a house on a hill. Allow the paint to do what it will when I’m stippling red brown onto a wet gray area and watch the house become rustic with brickwork along the walls; and after three brushstrokes that hold a half-mixed caking of black, white, and yellow ochre, behold the appearance of a dismantled contraption that is only a concoction that I found when playing with the paint — and this contraption somehow feels familiar even if it will have no name I can ever give it because I don’t really know what it is. Paint a tree, or paint two. One tree next to another, like two overlapping masses that almost abstract each other with their accumulated bulk. Why name these things and then paint them?

Putting aside all we have scientifically learned about trees over the recent centuries, what does a tree do for the person on the street? This is the question I should be asking. How do we approach plant life today that is universal, maybe no different from the people of other times? The understanding that came from standing in the shade or from admiring flowers or from pulling a fruit off a tree has not changed all that much in the expanse of time between us and the first people that did such things.

But how do we know this? Words from the distant past have reached out and touched our imaginations. Almost every other aspect of life from the past has been lost. But certain words did make it through to us. We only know the paintings from the Greco-Roman times exclusively in words; the paintings never survived the turmoil that ended antiquity. So that when one ancient writer claims that such and such an artist had painted a bird with such exquisite detail that an actual bird perched nearby and began singing to it, we picture this only inside our thoughts.

Quite apart from my obsession with trees, I was at the same time inventing ways of putting down my pictorial ideas. Even though I painted, I had given up on sketching years ago. Yet I still wanted to find a way to record things I saw outside the studio, developing a “sketching” technique that involved no drawing. It was purely verbal. I would write down descriptions of things I wanted to later paint. I was pursuing this unorthodox methodology because it tapped into memories, if still available, rather than how a scratchy image on a piece of paper represents the memory. The scratchy strokes from an actual sketch were usually haphazard, and so copying from such an image would do more to deviate from what you had in your mind’s eye.

Eventually, I boiled down the verbal sketches to three statements and nothing more. If that were not enough to help me raise the image from the recent past, then I considered it lost anyway. By the time I was getting into trees like this, I found that you didn’t even have to write these statements down, since there were only three of them. I was using the fuzzy image already in my thoughts with these three memorized properties. When I got to the part in a painting when the image was captured but still blurry, I took the three descriptions and chiseled out these points of interest.

And this became a system that I would use in my work, a pocket-full of causal rules for each painting. It was verbal, like reciting an incantation, like the secret words to unlock a portal or summon an entity. I found that as I painted these things from those three statements and the moving image in my head, I was revisiting the aspects of the thing involved and then putting it back together — deconstructing and then reconstructing it. And I soon noticed that the order that the statements came out affected the work on a fundamental level. If I first used words for a piece of distant soil and then a nearby flower, that sequence made the work go in a particular direction, just like it would take it in a different path if focusing first on the nearby flower and then on the distant soil. Likewise, if I conjured the dominant colors before the forms, that would relinquish a unique set of effects, and then again different if the forms came first.

I’m stumbling into a contradiction because names are words, and words are what I use in this sketching technique to aid me in holding a memory. I see words as those pieces of symbolic material that flit across the things that catch our attention, and the same word can even establish faulty connections with things if there is a misunderstanding, and this is not necessarily improper or wrong.  A contradiction? It depends. If a name is followed by a definition, we have turned the corner and arrived at a dead end that holds nothing but a single object, and this is a trap. If I use words to invoke a surge of memory, it is a magic spell.

I will try something today. Instead of using my sketching technique or the revelatory book on trees, I will start with nothing but an idea, and after thinking a moment, it comes to me: growing the painting like a plant. Starting at the root, I’ll paint my way through the trunk, creating textures that a random, ruined brush makes — that kind of brush that has had paint collected in its ferrule consequently splaying its hairs like wild weeds in the cracks of an abandoned gas station. Pushing the excess paint upward, I will delineate the climb of branches according to one of the four or five patterns I have observed in trees on my hikes, and the wild bristles will form their own specific conclusions on the texture and imperfect contours. From there, I will use a brush with shorter bristles to stamp in leaves with a thick green put together by adding deep blue to a lemon yellow. And if this brew evokes a tree I find familiar, I will bring the final details to life however I can without any other obligations. Even if verbal fragments keep going off in my head.

 

— Rey Armenteros

Leave a comment | Categories: Essay | Tags: ,

The Notepad (first published in The Nasiona)

17 August 2023 by Rey Armenteros

Today, I am hiking on a mountain. I pass a shirtless man with long hair and bid him a good morning. He asks me what I’m writing in my pad, where I am getting down thoughts, and I almost say they’re for a piece of past remembrances, but I just tell him they are notes.

He is going in my direction, asking “what the fuck the notes are for.” And I tell him they’re for my art.

“Oh, you’re an artist,” he says, throwing his arms around. “What kind of an artist are you, the kind that’s poor or the kind that sells out? You know I knew a photographer that made 25,000 dollars a day. Can you make that much?”

We’re wending our way through the craggy path, and he continues. “I had a working relationship with art once, went to LA Trade Tech. For over twenty years I did…” He drops off for a second, livid or merely huffing and puffing. “So, you go to school for art and tell me what you learn.”

I think about the answer but don’t get the chance.

“They put you out there and you need to make stuff. But it’s all about fighting the ego. We all get the ego coming around, fucking shit up. The teachers don’t teach that. It’s better if you took your little notebook and shoved it up your ass, they’d like that better.”

I turn to look at him and he’s keeping pace with me. There is still ten minutes to go on this trail before I return to the parking lot and to my car.

He is calling me an intelligent young man and he says I am in pretty good shape, able to make him get a little out of breath — but we’re about the same age and I’m really picking up the pace in the hopes of losing him. “I saw art,” he goes on. “I was there! I saw Michelangelo, and after that I didn’t need anything else!” Here is when the guy starts screaming, flailing his arms around, hollering about fucking art and the greatness of Michelangelo, that son of a bitch!

I am assessing the situation. People like my mother would look at this as an opportunity. She once told me about a 24-hour coffee and donut shop where she and her sister were caught in a conversation with a stranger in the next table who appeared homeless and was going on and on about things. Years later, the same thing happened to me when a friend and I ended up late one night at some 24-hour donut place that had nobody else but this bearded man two tables down with a paper cup in front of him talking to us about the ways of the world. My mother the next day was convinced that the bearded man was some kind of saint or possibly an angel in the guise of the lowest of the low, and she was positing the idea that the bearded man my friend and I talked to was the very same homeless man she had run into all those years before.

It didn’t matter if anybody would believe such a thing because it went beyond the scope of the situations and created a connection. This was not about the bearded man or the homeless man but about finding meaning in coincidence. And this was not about the shirtless man this fine morning but more about what propelled him into going on and on about a subject in which he felt he had some expertise.

At the moment the guy was bellowing and gesticulating, my mind was racing. Do I humor him? Is he dangerous? Is he just having fun, you know a little play acting? This could be a man who sees himself as the wise man of the woods, a former biker, a journeyman, a wandering artisan; or this could be a man subjected to too many movies who has chosen this persona based on two or three fictitious characters he held in high regard, and so he modeled his discourse accordingly. His traits are what goaded him to wax impassioned about these areas of interest. I do believe this provided the fuel.

But the spark was my notepad. The shirtless man was reacting to my notepad; he was looking at my busy hands before ever looking into my face. A notepad is a social weapon. If you pull out a notepad at a restaurant or when waiting in line for an official to attend to you, you are putting people on the alert. A notepad is a reminder that the things people say and do can come back to haunt them — even in this day and age when nobody uses notepads.

To me, a notepad is the kind of tool that allows you to place thoughts on paper at almost any opportunity. If I compare it to daydreaming at the coffeeshop with a full-sized notebook in front of me, where my ideas take up a deliberate pace, the speed that thoughts move while you are taking a walk are not only different but better prepared for interruptions that can lend a hand from a different angle.

I am gliding across the mountain path with the interior monologue that finds me on a chance encounter with a piece of curious vegetation or with someone who says more than hello, and it sets the new course toward the deviation I have just taken. The sudden hazards from a steep, pebbly slope could also force a halt in my thoughts.

But it’s not just about the possibility of interruptions and the wonderful tangents they create; a notepad allows on the spot thoughts to be captured immediately. Words that come later, when memory resuscitates former reflections, have already lost their connection when the line of thought has been left behind. I might remember the exact thoughts when I’m at home, and I might write them down then. But it won’t be the same. It is never the same later. It can only be that certain way now.

Without a notepad in your back pocket, the rhythm of these thoughts is lost. That is why when I’m swept into a sudden beat, I write and walk at the same time. This includes any kind of walking, even just pacing the room. The tempo of my steps falls in line with my heartbeat, my breathing, my thoughts, and then my words. The words that come to me on such a line can never be nuanced in any other way.

I’d like to believe that when I’m engrossed with my notepad like that on a trail, I must radiate extreme concentration, which might put off people from even saying good morning, but that is not always the case. On the contrary, I’m starting to understand that I must have that kind of face. People I just meet tend to blather at me without an ounce of shame. They never want to hear what the other person has to say; they just want their ten minutes of sermon, therapy, or editorial. But if they give me the chance and I tell them I’m an artist and they ask me about my art, I hardly ever know what to say.

This might have been the very thing I was thinking about when the shirtless man interrupted my walk and my thoughts. My notes, before the point of impact, exhibit the fragments: “Commentary provides no real answers. Artists oblige the public its answers. Limits meaning. Misdirection.” A coincidence? Yes, so it seems — a connection! Actually, I can’t remember what I meant by this because his interruption pushed it beyond the reach of my recollection, but it sounds like I was mentally defending myself against hypothetical accusers and jotting it down. In the notes I was scrawling while negotiating stones and ruts on the trail, I must have been bringing up the reasons why I was justified in making the art that I do.

You find the whole world expects a reason for the artwork, and so some of the most affected writing comes out of it. This is where the artist statement comes in; it is a device used in all aspects of the business of art. If you want to be part of an exhibition, the curator needs your artist statement in order to be able to know how to understand your work. But the statement from the artist is a fabrication intended for the convenience of others and not for the advantage of the work. It foists a burden on the artist to come up with a good pitch in order to be understood and possibly taken seriously. What results is verbal incongruity, conveyor belt concepts, mayhem. You have those artists that explain away everything leaving little to mystery, and you have artists that seem to be describing something else — something completely different! — creating a cloud in front of the work. You have apologetic ones and confrontational ones, and you have statements that tell a half-hearted story. The worst type of statement comes from the well-versed or educated artist, who knows which words and sentence formats spell out the most know-how, like the choice language of job placement, because when putting to use all these explanations — when push comes to shove — the artists of our current society turn themselves into just another businessperson, advertiser, or politician. I know this because I have written enough statements to cover all these situations.

It seems everybody has something to say. This piece of “past remembrances” might be about nothing more than two men clawing to get their ideas heard, one with some future hypothetical audience and the other with any opportunity he could.

If right now, somebody asks me what my work is about or what it means, I’d turn the table around and ask them what they thought it was about. Why bother writing this in my notepad? Who is listening anyway?

Certainly not the shirtless man. He kept going on about the Vikings and how they were beaten by the Romans, about how Vikings were the white people, how their metal was the greatest in the earth, and he was there, and he learned how they made it. He talked about icons and religious paintings, mentioning that art can only be religious, that too much art had naked women, that art was “high-class porno.” He asked me if I went to church, and when I answered in the negative, he said that was good.

When he asked me my nationality and I answered American, he said there was no such thing as an American. He was telling me about some guy who won the Congressional Medal of Honor on TV the other day, and I told him I didn’t know anything about it. “You’re not an American. You got the colors, red T-shirt and blue jeans, so you look like an American. Where were you during 9/11?”

It’s funny he should ask because I was in Japan. He didn’t wait for the answer. He came off the trail. “Shit.”

 

— Rey Armenteros

Leave a comment | Categories: Essay | Tags: ,

The Ten and a Half-Minute Window

17 July 2023 by Rey Armenteros

Progress is pulled by the other cars in traffic. The other cars are your traction. You gauge the rate of your advance by how many you manage to get in front of. Even a heavy buildup is not so bad if you happen to be the one that gets the right lanes, because no matter how slowly the world is moving, it is always better to be faster than everyone else around you.

Without the interplay of other cars, and the hills and turns alongside them, you fail to sense the speed. It is like having the windows up and how it severs your connection to the outside elements. When you have the windows down, the wind in your face and the noise throw you roaring down the road. The sonic vibration make the speed a reality. That may be why today, when all can be made to be quiet, noisy cars are still in demand.

A career is the same thing. Without the interactions of others, you won’t have access to a “feeling” of how you’re doing. You need friends and acquaintances to situate yourself in your place in the world. And if you happen to be noisy in just the right speeds, you are the one who is garnering traction for success.

The conditions of a satisfactory commute need to be just right. And I’m not talking about a real traffic pile-up, where all has hopelessly halted, where there is no other recourse but to imagine yourself far away, listening to something on your speakers for purely escapist intentions. For the traffic I have in mind, there needs to be flow. There is a special time in the morning; it is neither too close to here or to there — it rides the line on a ten and a half-minute window. If you leave your house within this window, you will enter a roadway of marvelous pits and turns. In this special time of the weekday morning where there are streams of cars, but not enough to grind you to a halt, you weave through lanes like a stage magician goes through tricks.

During that time, the commute is a playground, when the spaces between the vehicles are just so, allowing you to speed up to pass a slow-moving van just before getting in front of a rig. I’m slipping past a long line of cars as I think of this. I’m watching out for the one car actually going faster than me that will tear in front of me — a potential accident. All five senses are pivoting on such a possibility. The exit is coming. I stay on the left-most lane until the last mile. I know the feel of the approach. An opening shows up on the right lane, and I take it. In ten more seconds, I move into the right again. I can see the exit now. I need to get over two more lanes. I do this without cutting into people because no good comes out of pissing people off, and I’m on the home stretch, but there’s a truck in front of the five cars before mine, and I decide to gun it. I cross into the next lane, loop back over and get in front of the steady mass of truck and followers, getting off the ramp and looping toward a yield sign on the local road, starting the last leg of my trip on the local streets. The following five —  no, seven green lights you breeze through are the bonus points. You can shave two minutes from your drive to work. You can cut off five whole minutes if you get a good rhythm. Today, I’m pounding off almost ten.

You are diverting your attention with the extras of weaving through traffic to score more points. You’re starting your day with movement, and you hope that you can take that momentum and use it at work. It sure beats the other option, when it has always been a monotonous chore of pressing the brake after touching the gas and then pressing the brake. There is nothing to be said about a gridlock because nobody wants to recall this special corner of frustration, and if work happens to be the same, the day may be more misery and less interactive fun. The people stuck in such a day play music and move their heads to some other frequency to leave behind the obligation of harmonizing with the rest of the droll world.

But out of nowhere, an unexpected vehicle cuts in front of me, forcing my brakes to prevent an accident. A pickup truck with all the gardening tools swinging off the frame of pipes over the flatbed. No really! Does this guy need to get to the next client’s yard so bad? To risk an accident? He’s a gardener; it’s not like he’s got a clock to punch in. And before I get to the destination, there’s two other guys snapping in front of you without a care to the curses aimed at them and their forebears. They’ve got to get to the red light before you. On some level, I can understand this logic. Because you never know if the guy you didn’t cut in front of happens to be the slowest in the pack. But these people don’t care about honking horns and flashing high beams. They got in front of you, and that’s all that matters.

That is one of the possibilities a tight, dynamic traffic load brings. It is a feature you’ve got to contend with. A dynamic road could bring such unexpected causality.

The only other possibility on the road is when it is open. Even here in Los Angeles County, there are times when the roads are free of any congestion, and driving on that road does not invoke ten decisions every minute because you’re going at the speed you find comfortable, and you know when you need to exit several miles ahead of the game. If weaving through traffic is fun and being stuck behind a wall of idle cars is soul-draining, then the open road is the way it should be, you argue. Why shouldn’t it be this way? You are thinking about it, and why couldn’t everything be this way?

But the open road is a myth that only happens on the roadways during freakish times. The truth is that we humans enjoy the traction caused by obstacles on the road as we try to negotiate them to leave them in our dust. If those obstacles are other people, well then so much the better. It improves our game to actually be matched against the minds of others.

You feel it’s the same thing when applying for that job. You never got the interview. But then you find out about the acquaintance that had the exact same credentials as you, and you discover that this person not only made the first and second interview, but this person got the job! And you wonder how you never got the initial interview in the first place. And you put the pieces together, trying to account for this colossal misstep in the machinery, and coming up with some foul-tasting conclusions.

If you get passed up for a job, it is because somebody else got it. And when you get that job you wanted, it is you holding your vehicle steady all the way on the left before making the approach on the suitable exit and cutting to the right to pass everyone who was patiently lining up to get a chance at it. Many people can’t win at that game. That game is won by the ones with the better cars and the better windows of opportunity right from the start. It is an uneven game, and the ones that are in the back have little chance of ever making it out of the freeway.

But one big difference between the progress of cars and careers in this attenuated analogy is that everyday, you start over in traffic. Your game does not resume from yesterday. You could win today even if you never had a chance of winning the big time in life. If you start your morning by beating almost everybody else in the traffic game, it might just start off your day on the right note. And that’s at least one good day.

 

— Rey Armenteros

Leave a comment | Categories: Essay | Tags: ,

← Older posts