ZAPstract - art that zaps!

Category Archives for: ReyA’

Moments with John Paul Leon – First

16 May 2021 by Rey Armenteros

JP Leon, Alex Armenteros, & Alex Leon

We would get together and play with Star Wars figures, talk about movies like Bakshi’s Lord of the Rings, and just have fun. We were cousins by marriage. JP and Alex’s mother was first cousins with our stepfather. Our stepfather had just married our mom, and he told us that we were going to meet two other boys just like us. They grew up in New York City and hadn’t been in Miami long. That Sunday evening, at my stepdad’s parent’s house, they came over, toys in hand, instantly warming up to us. We recognized right away that JP and Alex were different. Their ideas, their style of playing, the sense of humor all came together to form something special.

For a brief eight or nine months, we lived in the same apartment building. We were on the fifth floor and they were on the second floor. And yet, even in such close proximity, we only got together twice during this era. Once was for Alex’s birthday where our parents got him a Shogun Warriors mini-figure made of die-cast metal, called Poseidon. Getting together with them, no matter the reason, was always the best time!

And it got even better the day we learned about their passion for comics. We were into comics too. The problem was that they were into DC, and we were into Marvel. That might have been the first time we didn’t see eye-to-eye. I started the argument by saying DC sucked. A couple of years back, I used to read my school friends’ DC comics before I became a comic book collector. I actually liked Green Lantern, The Legion of Superheroes, and Batman. But that was then. It all changes when you take something seriously, consider yourself a serious comic book collector, and draw boundaries based on the one or two things you really liked. I guess it was the same for them, because they thought Marvel sucked.

Well, we managed to convince each other to check out the other’s comics. JP and Alex were the ones that got me into Teen Titans and Omega Men. I got them into X-Men.

Like me, they were drawing their own comics. They were showing me and telling me the stories. JP had his group of superheroes, and Alex had his own. I don’t know that they ever mixed the stories. I was looking at their drawings and recognizing that they were both talented. My brother is also named Alex. He was the only one that didn’t draw in our group. And his interest in comics was not like ours. JP and Alex had dreams of making it into comics, like I did. Every time we’d get together after that, we’d draw or go on and on about the comics that had just come out, showing specific panels from favorite comics where the good parts were happening, going into the backstory, referring to pieces of creative lore about which artist created what and which artist was better than whom.

The next big thing that happened was Dungeons & Dragons. It was an amazing coincidence! Alex and I received the D&D Basic Set on the same Christmas that JP and Alex did. We were on the phone going on about it, and in a matter of days, we were at their house going through our first adventure. As a new Dungeon Master, I had no idea what I was doing. The first character death was probably JP’s thief. It was great for a laugh.

We only got together once in a while, and we were as avid about D&D as we were about comics. My brother and I played every weekend, and they played just as much. The next time we played D&D the four of us, Alex Leon was the Dungeon Master. We played this ninja-like adventure module called “The Veiled Society.” We were playing in Alex’s room, and it was decorated with fantasy posters. The Star Wars toys were probably still there, but they would soon be gone. Days later, I would be telling them about my own Arabian assassin, Darkoth, based on one of those posters, which had these ninja-like figures garbed like warriors from the Arabian Nights.

JP and Alex were getting official D&D modules, and they were passing them onto us after they had finished them. They were soon moving on to Advanced Dungeons & Dragons, and we did the same not long after. On the phone, we’d talk about these adventures. JP and Alex played their AD&D straight, bringing in serious death, just like us, but they would spice it up with humor.

When they started their World of Greyhawk campaign, they were really playing at a higher level than we were. A large part of that, I think, is because Alex was becoming a really good Dungeon Master, allowing for things to just happen when they needed to instead of railroading the characters into what the DM wanted them to do, like I tended to do. The few times the four of us played together, he was the DM, and I witnessed his skills firsthand. He’d make creative almost quirky situations for the characters. They told me about an adventure where they used a crossbow to shoot a rope so that they could climb a wall. They ended up shooting a guard who was holding onto the wall for dear life, as JP’s characters were trying to climb up. The trouble was that if they shot off all his hit points, he’d collapse, taking the heroes with him.

Alex maneuvered through these situations, and JP injected his characters with the same sense of humor he placed in his superhero comics. All the D&D and comic book stories were relayed in exacting detail as we talked about these personal war stories. In his comics, JP had an arrogant superhero called Lance. He grew up rich and was used to ordering people around. He was the type of guy that would hold up his hand to stop traffic as he was crossing the street. One day, he did that to a carload of bank robbers that had pulled a job, and they ran him over. JP’s halfling character would come up with crazy phrases like, “You’ll smoke a turd in hell for that!”

Comics and D&D was that time before we started caring about stuff, like how we dressed and what kind of music we liked. I was the oldest by a year. The two Alex’s were also a year apart. And JP was the youngest by about a year. During my first year of high school, their family invited us to go to Sanibel Island. They went to the same resort every year on Memorial Day Weekend.

That first time at Sanibel, the four of us hardly left the pool. If we weren’t playing King of the Mountain, practically drowning each other and then getting miffed about it, we were conducting the world championship match of ping-pong, poolside. When it rained, we were indoors, drawing on paper menus, collaborating on sketches of our superheroes. I think I have six of those papers somewhere in my mom’s house in Miami.

We would scout outside the resort, and we were playing out our adventure in our heads as we were walking down the empty streets of a nearby community. My brother said he knew a way back to the resort and that he would beat us there with his shortcut. He disappeared through some foliage. We let him go, but when I noticed a car turn the corner a couple blocks behind us, I yelled to our group that the dark lord’s minions had finally caught up with us. We started running. Then we heard a police siren, and we froze. It was the wrong car to be running from. And the deputy sheriff started questioning us without getting out of the car. Why were we running from his car? We were just playing, like pretending. Who was that other boy who was lurking around the shrubs? We explained it was my brother. He told me, “You know, your brother looked mighty suspicious?” He let us go, and JP and Alex later told my brother that he looked mighty suspicious. That was an ongoing joke for the next couple of years. We would be playing D&D, talking about marching order, and JP would tell Alex, “You get in the front; I don’t want you behind me — you look mighty suspicious.”

The next time we went to Sanibel, I pulled the same thing when we were walking towards some woods on our first night back. I pointed and yelled that there was a man with a bloody hatchet coming out of the woods, and the four of us were running back to the bungalows. I never did learn my lesson.

Much of the time in the swimming pool, we were relaying the stories we were building in our minds with the intention of making them into comic books. When it rained, we were indoors drawing our characters; we were explaining who was who and what their powers were and what they had done. One of JP’s main heroes was Aneron, whose hands could detach from his forearms on long cables made of “aneronian” steel.

Alex and I didn’t go a third time, and I remember talking to JP over the phone telling him that this catastrophe was due to the Evil Magic of Miami. My incongruous expression didn’t make a whole lot of sense. Why did I refer to it like that? I don’t know. I think the problem was more complicated than that, and I was finding any expression to just deal with it without it referring to what was really happening. My parents might soon be getting a divorce, and I didn’t want to invite that subject with JP and Alex. It was an adult problem, and it was beyond the realm of kids. But JP would mention the Evil of Miami for the next couple of years for anything that went wrong. We were still cousins, even if our stepdad was no longer with my mom.

Art by John Paul Leon

Art by John Paul Leon

Leave a comment | Categories: Essay, Memoir, ReyA' | Tags: , , ,

A Single Speck (first published in BlazeVOX)

02 May 2021 by Rey Armenteros

Imagine a speck smaller than the eye can see suddenly become the Universe and everything in it. That is one infinitesimal thing becoming every other thing.

If I look around this common room, there is paper and wood furniture and a telephone and ink and dirty clothes and bottles and toys and books and dirty pictures and even particles of light coming off the top light bulb.

Now, the scientists say that the speck must have been pretty dense.

I calculate for a moment about how many specks I can fit in my room. Then, I mentally look out my window and imagine all the things around the corner of my perception and then mentally fill it up with specks.

The picture I’m getting includes layers of sky and beyond, with the idea of spinning globes separated by gases and rocks and things that may not even have names yet. There are more corners and layers in these places, and well…

I fill everything up with specks. It is unreal, but I am a sorcerer for just this moment, and I conjure specks as clearly as the actual spaces they fill. And over my shoulder, I feel the presence of a number that no human concern has ever encountered. An eerie feeling takes over. The entity introduces itself, and this is the number of the specks that fill up all the spaces in this universe of ours, the one that resides in our minds if nowhere else.

Now, I understand I’m doing this backward, because I am filling the spaces and not the objects which actually derived from this one speck at the beginning of time. But that is not important because human comprehension can go either way it wants, and it won’t go very far.

Eventually, the question I get, when the entity takes its leave and all is back to normal, is how much larger can the universe actually grow, and just what kind of density are we talking about here? 

Leave a comment | Categories: A Poem, Poetry, ReyA' | Tags: , , ,

Notes to Self

25 April 2021 by Rey Armenteros

One horrible late Saturday morning, I learned that if you keep drinking and doing drugs, you’re going to kill enough brain cells to change you forever. Somebody was telling me that over the phone after I confessed about my previous night’s adventures, and she was like, “Don’t you know you’re killing brain cells?”

I must have known that. I’m sure I read it somewhere. But then she said that those are the types of cells you don’t get back.

And I was like, “Hold it right there!” If that were true, then I would never, ever drink again. That’s what I told her. I knew it sounded familiar. It was like the setup for a joke. But I meant it.

Everybody means it, but then the day comes when everybody is having a good time without you, drinking away while you’re sipping your soda. What’s the real harm in one drink? You explain to people as you spike your coke with whiskey that the point is not to follow the oath to the letter but to take everything in moderation. And not drinking at all is not taking things in moderation.

And when the next day, you’re recuperating from the worst hangover in history, you explain to those that are throwing your words back at you that by moderation, you didn’t mean for one night. You meant moderation in general, which you argue is a lot stronger than just being moderate on one occasion.

What the hell do you even mean by any of this? Yes, I mean that I’m with you that I didn’t practice this moderation because I lost control, but I am looking at the bigger picture, moderation through the years. So what if I slip one night!

Over the years, nothing changes. You recall old oaths when you mention those exact words, but this time, as a joke. “Damn, that Fourth of July thing was out of control,” and you tell your neighbor joshingly, “I’m never going to drink again,” and he immediately gets the joke.

But don’t you know you’re not supposed to drink so goddamn much? This is one of those look-in-the-mirror moments, when you are not so sure anymore if you’re pasty-faced because of last night’s bout or you’re just permanently pasty-faced like that old homeless guy you knew who looked fifteen years older than he was and had a liver the size of a medicine ball. No, really, time to stop.

And so it goes. When does it stop? Not likely to stop until some physical ailment forces it on you. Then it’s like I rest my case.

The problem about finding that you’re getting older is not that you’re getting older, and it is not that your health is waning. It is that you actually start to follow through with your oaths. Your conclusions become laws in your life. You discover that you don’t like water skiing, and now that option is no longer available to you. I will never do it again. And then it gets worse because there are things you actually used to like that you no longer tolerate. I remember the day when I decided I was never going to enter another nightclub again. It was long in the coming. Having spent hundreds of nights in clubs offered a slow dawning on your true position on such things. One day, you follow up on the slowly-curing conclusion.

(Note to self: Dovetail this nicely with a strand of things you don’t do anymore, like go to the barber shop or get together with friends. Better yet: Stop drinking already. Write it in notes you stick up in various unlikely places so they surprise you the first number of times before they start annoying you.)

Leave a comment | Categories: A Thought, Essay, ReyA' | Tags:

Dream Impressions

14 March 2021 by Rey Armenteros

At the second story of a coffeeshop makeshift library. Giving tests to kids who couldn’t make it. At a table, a couple of tables forward from my view, I watched myself administering papers to the attention of a child. A hauberk of linked ingots later presses into view. It was intended as a sleeve to the same delicate flat matter on sheafs of envelopes — like life’s early day photo albums.

Leave a comment | Categories: Fragment, ReyA' | Tags:

Choices (first published in BlazeVOX)

12 March 2021 by Rey Armenteros

Choices

DIRECTIONS: Read this to powerful music.
In all that time, I would have this thought.

You use words. Others have thoughts too.

But it never fails. It happens.

Disappointment. Something to overcome.

And the only way that can be done is with a tool.

A hammer. And you understand something larger.

Open chamber. Bits of skull with matted hair.

The housings of thought. But not your thoughts.

And once you give in to this curiosity, stop.

Regret sets in. And something larger…

 

(OR: Read this to whatever you like.)

Leave a comment | Categories: A Poem, Poetry, ReyA' | Tags: , , ,

Personalized Responses

21 February 2021 by Rey Armenteros

It is likely you’ve never seen my essay titled “The Notebook.” It was published in the literary journal, The Nasiona. But if you have, you know it ends on one word: “shit.”

That one word was called into question by another literary journal. I was having the essay make the submission rounds. This is before the Nasiona had accepted it. I got a number of rejections.

Rejections from literary journals are almost never personalized. They usually start out with how honored they are about my interest in their journal. Then, they mention all the great work that had arrived and about how much they appreciate this too. At about this point, the general rejection letter uses the word “however” and they say something to the effect that they can’t publish everything. More often than not, they use the word “unfortunately” for this task and then mention they can’t publish your work. They finish off the rejection letter with “Good luck” or “Much luck in your endeavors.”

They never call it a rejection. They no longer reject. The new word is “decline.”

When you receive enough of these, you find you are no longer paying attention to the words that show up a lot. If you say “unfortunately” enough times to yourself, you might find the word no longer means anything after about two minutes of this.

However, once in a while, the declination you receive does not mince words like that. Unfortunately, they found that your work “does not fit our journal at this moment,” and they don’t apologize or wish you any kind of luck. And then you find yourself missing those two or three keywords that you thought didn’t mean anything to you anymore since it was those words that kept getting used for things that were called declinations but were actually rejections.

Nevertheless, I am not here to talk about any of those words today. I am here to talk about the last word in my essay, “The Notebook,” which was the word, “shit.” This word was called into question when the essay was declined by a certain literary journal. In this day and age, this literary journal committed the generous act of actually sending me a declination letter that was personalized. Though no one wants a rejection letter (by any other name), any reasonable writer has to appreciate when a publication reaches out and actually gives you feedback. This particular letter sent me feedback on the pros and cons of my essay and why they chose not to publish it.

A personalized rejection was a rare thing, like a fifty-dollar bill rolling around on the sidewalk with no one around to witness you picking it up. It is a gift, in other words, but I was starting to scrutinize this gift because not only was it not what I wanted — it must have been given to the wrong person.

It was the personalized comments themselves that gave me a moment of pause. It made me want to write back. I know my reaction is not normal, but I went ahead and did it anyway, because as I was putting it in my response to their letter of declination, they “opened the dialogue by granting me these observations, and I needed to take this opportunity to retort.”

My letter continued by stating that of the four negative points they found with the essay, two of them were purely subjective, and I had no contention with them.

But on second thought, I did. One of the subjective arguments brought up the idea that the comments about art I made really didn’t go anywhere in the essay. And my response was that they were never meant to go anywhere. They were only there to serve as a comparison with the things that were being said by the stranger I had met as narrated in the essay. That was it.

The other observation that I am categorizing as subjective stated that though they enjoyed most of the writing, some of the sentences were too long. And I had to think about this before responding. I thought some people simply don’t enjoy long sentences, although if you were looking for an undulating thought that seemed to flow through several ideas at once, nothing did it in quite the same way as a long sentence. As a matter of fact, for the flow I have in mind, a well-constructed long sentence beats out anything else, because it’s simply not possible to compete with that when you have these flagrant periods capping the flow at every turn. A literary journal that doesn’t like long sentences is like a builder of mansions not wanting to use too many bricks. It didn’t quite add up for me. And I mentioned that in my letter of response. But of course it could be that you (the literary journal in question) did not like the particular way I put those sentences together in my piece, which is a valid sentiment.

The other two remarks, however, made me pause far longer than I find comfortable, because the remarks themselves were troubling. One of them declared, “There are many typos and grammatical errors that could have been eliminated with some simple editing.” In archaic nautical terms, this is what they call firing a shot across the bow.

It manifested in me the type of shock you receive when the water you dove into is a lot colder than you had first surmised when you were calculating your jump and never giving a single thought to the temperature of the water.

Typos? They never mentioned what they were, but I knew for a fact they were not talking to me about them. I don’t send out anything until everything is in its proper place. This letter was personalized to the wrong person.

But their last remark confirmed that they made no mistake, that they had intended to send the letter to me after all. And I knew that because they referred to that word I did have in my letter, which was no typo. It was “shit.” They had a problem with this word. Not because it was a bad word. They had a problem because it was in quotation marks, which is often used for quotations by certain personages in a mass of text. The question they had is who was intended to have said it?

Picture this. There are only two people in the essay. I and a stranger. In the essay, there  are other quotations, but throughout the text, none of them were made by me. In fact, every single quotation was made by the stranger, who was in the process of talking my ear off, as they say. He was the type of person who openly resorted to profanity even with strangers he had just met. This stranger rarely let me get in a word during our conversation, and I exhibited this during the course of the essay more than once, notably illustrated by the fact that anything I might have said was never in quotation marks. Can you picture it? Moreover, I showed that he was the type who made confrontational remarks, who thought he knew everything and so had to get the last word in. My point is if you read this essay and really gave it the time and consideration, you would know without any doubt who uttered that word.

I left it open without “he said” because it needed no clarification, but I also enjoyed the slight double take on the part of the reader to end this one well. And that is why even though it was obviously not me that said the word, it could have been — on second thought — me. And that was the part they just couldn’t get, this literary journal that did not resort to a form letter, that put all this effort on responding personally to at least one of the submissions that they declined. I don’t know, but this led me to believe that my essay was never even given a proper reading in the first place, and so it forced my hand: I had to send my own argument to their “fine institution of literary excellence that champions the short sentence and math-like clarity.”

I know what I did. I committed a wrong by responding to them. This kind of thing is just not done. I know I really dropped the ball by taking this personally when they didn’t mean to insult. I know that in archaic nautical terms, I sent them a “broadside” in an effort to pull down all their rigging.

And they were one of the nice literary journals that did not deserve such a thing, because they actually cared enough to give personalized responses, even if they failed to read my submission with enough focus. And I know that if I did manage to pull down their rigging along with their sails what the consequences were going to be. They would resort to taking the course of “unfortunately” and “good luck.” But the crime was committed, and when my guilt sank in, the only thing left for me to say was “shit.”

Leave a comment | Categories: A Thought, Essay, ReyA' | Tags: ,

Contemplations in Reading

24 January 2021 by Rey Armenteros

First of all, I don’t ever want to write a book with that many pages. Those times I am reading a book that reaches the 666th page, I pause and wonder if that page is in fact the one that owns that ordinal distinction. The pagination might not have started on the first page of the story. Depending on when they started the count, six pages may have been lost to title, blank page, then title again, along with indicia and some quotations, and my place in the actual text might be on its 660th page, and this disturbing sequence of repeated numbers has actually not yet arrived. I have six more actual pages to read to get past it. It’s like the 13th chapter and the 13th floor, but worse, because not as many books have that three-digit piece of amalgamated spookery. If I read through such chapters and pages like I once avoided cracks on the sidewalk, I look at that page as something to quickly pass and move far enough beyond it to make sure I had also passed the 666th page of the actual text. No point in getting the bookmark out and prolonging this bad luck for the next several hours or till tomorrow.

When greeted by the 669th, you are reminded there are other possibilities. One of the digits is upside-down. I have to go beyond this one and the textual version of it too. But then, what about the 699th and the 696th?

The book I was reading today did not quite reach the 960s, but I thought about what a drag it would be if it did. I read about the symbolism in numerology so many years ago, I hardly remember the ramifications of these numbers. But to this day, I still have personal favorites, like nine, three, and two, and of course, one.

The way to add things up in numerology is a simple system. If you have a number with more than one digit, you add each digit with the others to get a new number. If that new number is not a single digit number, you do it again, and you continue until you have one of the first nine numbers. For example, in 12, you add the one with the two, and you get three. With 2485, you add the numbers together and get 19. Then, add the one and the nine to get ten, and then add one with zero to get one.

666 gives 18, which reduces to nine. I like that last number but not the first. When you add 3 to that unholy number and get 669, it changes the results to 3, because 6+6+9=21, and 2+1=3. It is interesting because if you added 666 with 9, it retains the conclusion of 9. I just remember that all numbers divisible by 9 end up with 9 in this system. I believe it is the only number that does that.

Leave a comment | Categories: A Thought, Ludicrousness, ReyA' | Tags:

The Roaming Twenties

06 January 2021 by Rey Armenteros

Was it 2020 or 2021? I don’t know anymore. Maybe because of my propensity for correcting people, I would have said 2021. The crowd hailed the coming of 2020 as the beginning of the new decade. Mathematically, that would be wrong. That was why 2001, and not 2000, was the start of the new millennium.

But that is an analytical conclusion, and I don’t support analysis like I used to. I think gut feeling is a greater mode of observation, and if the turning of 2019 into 2020 sounds more like a big change, it doesn’t need to appeal to the loftier considerations of elementary mathematics — and that is enough for me.

However, just this once, it might be better to go with math and say that 2021 is in fact the start of the third decade of the new millennium, because when you look back on it, who the hell wants to start our present decade with 2020?

Leave a comment | Categories: A Thought, Ludicrousness, ReyA' | Tags: ,

The Duchamp Effect

29 December 2020 by Rey Armenteros

You can define this effect as that set of circumstances that prevents you from pushing a work of art forward. Fortunate or unfortunate, the effect surfaces when an accident puts a halt to the forward motion set by the decisions that came before it. At once, the painter is paralyzed when contemplating the next step.

Accidents appear in art in all sorts of ways. Some works of art were put together more by accident than volition. As an art student, when I started shading, I didn’t want to make faces in the mirror. So, I got accidents. My policy of making things up however I liked produced strange results in a hypothetical portrait, such as unwanted pencil mustaches, patches of scrawled sideburns, coal marks on one side of the nose, unfinished goatees, hairy foreheads, and Hitler.

Those types of accidents were not the good kind. But the Duchamp Effect comes from the happy accidents. The worst version of this is when the accident you just had when that damn brush fell from your grip makes that corner of the painting vibrant! You eye that corner with jolly surprise, because it is perfect. But then, there is the rest of the painting to contend with, and it is only related to that corner because it happens to be attached to it. All that to mean the painting is not actually finished; so you continue working on all the other parts to bring them to the same level of that accidental piece of perfection — without hitting the stellar corner itself, of course, or you’d ruin it. And then, that fortunate accident becomes a curse that you will dispel only when you finally acquire the courage to obliterate that explosion of good luck and move onward already.

Leave a comment | Categories: A Thought, Art Process, Essay, ReyA' | Tags: ,

A Social Platform by Another Name

13 December 2020 by Rey Armenteros

The truth? They really had me going. It was that site, the one that acted like a forum for people to support your every whim. It works like many others nowadays where you heart a bunch of stuff, whether you like the thing you’re hearting or not. It wasn’t important. What many of these participants were going for was popularity by getting the most hearts. This place was called Raslr (misspelled like that because it was being genuine). At least, that was the idea behind it.

The way it works is you open an account, and it’s yours. You call it whatever you want. You take whatever optimistic or sardonic attitude you want to instill in it, and you hopefully give it your own flavor. Then you start uploading your entries. You can write stuff about it, or share some image. You could do whatever you want.

It was going like that for a while, and I enjoyed this particular internet circle because of all the outlandish imagery you were getting from some of the fellow clients. They were no holds barred about it. They were sharing as it was occurring to them, like there was no tomorrow.

But then, Raslr came down with new rules. It was something familiar to many of us who had lived with that sort of thing years ago. It was an idea that had dropped off our social awareness. We used to call it censorship. But Raslr was calling it something else. I don’t remember the words they used, but it all sounded false. The people rebelled. I was rooting for the outspoken spirits, but I was doing it from the sidelines. I had no real time to get involved.

Some people were saying, “Come on, it’s just tits.” And it’s funny how that kind of declaration served either side well. Read the above quotation with the idea that the new rules should not bother censoring them, and then read it again with the idea that it should not be a big deal because you weren’t really going to miss them. They meant two different things to the opposing parties.

The reality about Raslr is that it had already fallen into disfavor before they even went into this reactionary quagmire. They were considered a social slum in most decent online circles. I didn’t care when I had gotten onboard because I had nothing else going, and I actually liked the content I was finding there. But the writing was on the wall months before the rules ever turned up.

This new proposal was doing Raslr’s waning image no good. They even gave everybody a deadline. On their list of images disallowed to the community, the words Raslr chose for one of these new rules were: “No women presenting nipples.” And the rebels had a field day with this piece of verbal ridiculousness. They fired off entries on the site displaying female hands unveiling male nipples. Women uncovering a tray of Venus pastries shaped like the offending body part. Even famous paintings of reclining nudes that were in no way considered erotic in this day and age. The members were providing a sounding board for how grounded Raslr’s sensibilities appeared — which was to say, not at all grounded.

And there were those that just countered Raslr by bringing more salacious pictures of women presenting nipples as their mouths were fellating some guy. Or a naked Venus in an old painting spreading her nakedness all over a bed, ass in the air while cherubs held a large ring that produced soap bubbles from the draft in her backdoor. It was telling Raslr, “Oh, you mean like this?”

Raslr tried to sound quirky in their retorts to these responses, trying to keep the layer of cool their board members deemed appropriate for this sort of thing. 

What a turnaround! I was in awe of what was happening. How could an apparently progressive entity be supporting such limitations in their platform? Raslr had been a place to find all such things without any censorship. It was the cool place, even if it were a social slum. Their new position on the matter, and the coming deadline for when they were going to crack down made people go supernova. Nipples were now brought on a grid of multiple images that catalogued varieties of contour and texture, making me reflect on just about every possibility.

The community members resisting these changes were also getting out signed petitions against this sort of thing, this censorship. A few of them even appealed to Raslr, declaring their livelihoods depended on the content they were posting on Raslr.

I knew it was soon going to be over. The rebels were going to lose this fight. There were bigger forces at work here. It had to do with policies that did not actually originate with Raslr but with a monster corporation, which was just then enforcing limits on the content viewed on its devices. (This well-known corporation will remain unnamed.)

I thought about all the things I was going to miss most from Raslr — the lurid satanic images of witches and goats, and the Japanese form of bondage that has some specific name I can’t think of right now. With this gone, I would have no real reason to go back to Raslr.

What was next? They were burning witches in hundreds of posts — a comment on what Raslr was going to do in two short days. Now, satanic images of women fornicating with mules. Then, labia stretched across a horizon of gruesome mountains populated by bug-like goblins. Hills becoming breasts, and penises were at every druidic formation, where the massive stones were no longer monoliths.

I was the one being led into these insinuations, and now that Raslr was closing the gates, I knew the inspiration was going to end. The signed petitions and the vocal denouncements made a lot of noise but did nothing, and I was left waiting on the sidelines wanting more witches.

Leave a comment | Categories: Essay, Memoir, ReyA' | Tags: , ,

← Older posts

Newer posts →